Today more and more people are using mobile phones and computers. Thus, people are losing the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that mobile phones and computers play an integral part in our lives. While I accept that the development of technology may meet our demand for living, I believe that it also has the negative impact on our communication skill.
On the one hand, using technology devices has many benefits in some ways. Firstly, technology gives users countless opportunities to make friends from various countries without traveling across the world. Therefore, they could save a great deal of time and money by doing this. Secondly, the availability of high-quality digital devices makes a great contribution to enhancing the level of job performance. For example, in the worlds of business and education, video conferencing has enabled to exchange ideas, discuss work and help employee complete task instead of wasting too much time to arrange a meeting.
On the other hand, there are several reasons why mobile phones and computers have to take responsibility for the decline of people's communication skills. First reason is that because of extremely focusing on cell phones or computers, people are likely to use less time with their true friends and their relatives. As a result, they will not know how to build a strong relationship and how to manage conflicts. Furthermore, by using mobile phones for a long time, people have a hard time mastering vital soft skills. For instance, children who spend the vast majority of time on cell phones more than talking directly with other people, always have weak soft skills than the others.
In conclusion, although technology brings some convenience to people, it seems to me that the usage of mobile phones and computers can negatively affect the communication skills of people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16014234875 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81399941773 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612099644128 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0734775695 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.538461538 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06120827912 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156862715915 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521100021818 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049581227109 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0797499440583 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576411404256 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.