Technology and Design of construction are developed and changed extremely fast. Many people have changed their buildings to modern styles, yet there are some people who still maintain and repair their old buildings. In my opinion, I think that we should conserve these old buildings for two reasons: history and attraction.
Old buildings should be kept to show the changes in history. We can use these buildings to teach children about the history of people in those areas in that the buildings illustrate many things happening in the past such as innovations, technologies, lifestyles, and so on. The children can learn how people live and what is the differences between the past and the present from these remaining constructions. For example, when we go to a historical place, we will see a lot of things which are different from today such as pots and tools. We cannot know how people at that time live without high technologies if we do not have anything to investigate. Therefore, children in the next generation will not understand their ancestors unless we conserve these old buildings.
Another reason we should maintain these buildings is that we can use them as attraction places for tourists. Modern constructions are built in every part of the world, so they are not enough interesting to attract foreign people to go to those areas. However, the old buildings in any country are usually distinct from other countries; consequently, if foreigners want to study the history of the countries or meet new experiences, they have to get to these places for learning. Many museums in the US, for instance, are the houses of rich people in the mid-19th century. Although they are just a house, people are willing to pay to get inside these buildings to see the beauty of architecture in that period.
In conclusion, there are plenty of advantages to spending money maintaining and repairing old buildings rather than change them to modern forms. Not only can they be the places for the learning of children, but they also can attract foreign people to the areas. If we do not change everything to modern styles, those will be benefits for local people in some ways.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1816.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94822888283 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76725770049 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490463215259 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.418057563 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.823529412 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5882352941 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.82352941176 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263435222425 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978055422999 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690863254451 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195223348184 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534454195321 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.