The argument whether university should be concerned about educating people to have wide general knowledge or not is widely debate, with many people claiming that university should not be concerned about educating people. Although, people make good decision, work effectively and independently as a result of knowledge. Ultimately, I think is better for university to be concerned about educating people with wide general knowledge.
However, these notion merit serious consideration and I will explain why in this essay with pertinent argument and examples. There are myriad of argument in favor of my stance. The most conspicuous one is that people with wide general knowledge are able to quickly secure employment compare to those in a specific area of study.
Moreover, another pivotal aspect of my argument is that having a wide general knowledge make job easier and more profitable unlike specializing in a specific field. For instance, underpinning the aforementioned, an empirical is that effective decision about the growth on an industry can be easily made without the presence of the general manager.
In view of the argument outlined above, one can conclude that the benefit of university educating people with wide general knowledge should not be ignore. Nevertheless, the drawbacks of not educating people with wide general knowledge should not be overlooked either.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 11, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this notion' or 'these notions'?
Suggestion: this notion; these notions
...with wide general knowledge. However, these notion merit serious consideration and I will ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[2]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...tance, underpinning the aforementioned, an empirical is that effective decision about the gr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, for instance, i think, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1169.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 214.0 315.596192385 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46261682243 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93431527473 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 176.041082164 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528037383178 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 395.1 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3233935181 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.9 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388611597023 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166118613589 0.084324248473 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126628020188 0.0667982634062 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242182453543 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109908987161 0.056905535591 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.