A University should accept male and female students equally in every subject.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
Write at least 250 words.
There is a current issue relating to the acceptance of unequal proportion of male and female students in university admissions may lead to a belief that the admission processes are sexist. Therefore, it is suggested that universities should admit students in the equal proportion/number of female and male students in every subject. However, such policy will not be feasible as the result will bring more inequality in a greater extent.
First of all, the main problem underlies in the departments where the number of female and male student candidates are highly unequal. For instance, in engineering departments, the number of male candidates are always higher because only a few females are interested to study engineering. If the admission sections try to put equal proportion/number of males and females, it is clear that females have higher admission chance rather than males.
Secondly, even though it is possible putting equal number of male and female students in the subjects where there are almost equal interests in both sexes, it still creates disadvantages in some promising candidates. Even though top candidates are unaffected, candidates at the lowest passing grades will be affected. For instance, a male candidate is theoretically possible to be accepted with his qualifications, but the admission cannot accept him because the male admission quota is already full. As a result, university will bear a consequence to lose more promising students in order to fulfil equal gender policy.
In a conclusion, universities should not put equal gender policy in the practice of university admission as some promising candidates will not be accepted because of their gender. As a result, this sounds more sexist than not putting equal gender policy.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for instance, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36690647482 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05869635873 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0072910022 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.333333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241034802511 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101883231456 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745936418344 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161474081301 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583517085937 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.