It is common knowledge that electronic media have a great role in our life nowadays. However, one may influence in our daily lifestyle such as personal relationships with other people. But is the effect necessarily a negative one?
As far as my experience concerned, many might tend to extend their groups of friends via electronic gadgets. They make new friends by chatting in social networking sites. Also, it helps people to keep in touch with families in another country. Hence, electronic device allows information to be shared easily among people in specific chat rooms and forums.
Sending email is another example of positive effect. People can send messages through Internet instead of writing letter. They no longer wait as much for receiving response from their contacts. Moreover, in my point of view, what makes people shocking is that they do not waste their time by visiting relatives as much, However, they communicate to each other by means of electronic devices such as mobile and laptop.
On the other hand, electronic media may cause problems. In the first place, people somehow tend to talk and speak face to face so that they prefer to communicate by sending message in Telegram and etc. Secondly, a very point to consider is 'time taking', individuals usually spend many hours to chatting, although it probably leads to sickness and endangers their health.
In conclusion, communicating through electronic media can therefore cause some problems between people, and it cannot replace meeting and talking face to face. But in general, it has more positive than negative effects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much might', 'a good deal of might'.
Suggestion: much might; a good deal of might
...? As far as my experience concerned, many might tend to extend their groups of friends ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...municate by sending message in Telegram and etc. Secondly, a very point to consider is t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, in general, such as, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19615384615 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63138488073 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638461538462 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.2083818445 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4375 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9375 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167223220982 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527805579934 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507844836925 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949881564655 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611538547881 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.