When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.

Technological developments have revolutionised the way people live completely. Majority of people believe that conventional abilities have become obsolete with introduction of machines which are cutting edge of computer technology. I particially agree with this sentiment since I also would argue that feelings and emotions will be vitally important until human extinction. This essay will look at them deeply.

On the one hand, many skills have become useless after computer programs and robots have introduced. Being bilingual and trilingual are not vital in today's world given the fact that there are countless translators which are intuitive are available in the market. In earlier times, speaking and writing in English besides mother tongue was essential to land a job while all smart phones have translator applications which enable them communicate in all languages. Students also do not have to learn Maths since there are countless computational programs which compute the most complex calculations in a second. For example , a survey by Job Portal in 2018 revealed that 80% of employers demand engineers who have excellent computational skills rather than have an excellent academic achievement.

On the other hand, human related skills will be essential in later times. Despite scientists are working to develop perfect robots, they will never have some understanding, emotion and feeling as human. They will not be able to write poems and novels as people have done. Further and more importantly, even though they will be able to work as many occupations such as waiters, teachers, doctors and engineers, they will not be able to work on psychology which requires intinct feelings. For instance, an article by New Times in 2017 reported that more than 7 million people will have made redundant until 2023 after all industries have updated their technology to Indistry to 4 and being psychologist will be very common in the near future.

By way of conclusion, many qualifications which were extremely important in earlier times have become obsolete since there are innumrable machines and applications to do them consequently many people state that having conventional skills and methods are unnecessary. I agree with this idea to some extend since I would contend that these smart machines will not be able to perform some human related subjects.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 622, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ex calculations in a second. For example , a survey by Job Portal in 2018 revealed...
^^
Line 7, column 299, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
Suggestion: extent
...cessary. I agree with this idea to some extend since I would contend that these smart ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 411, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to perform some human related subjects.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, if, look, second, so, while, after all, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1996.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36559139785 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87311418629 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551075268817 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0329200002 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.75 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0840401846607 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0368659302276 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304786567565 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0717823540553 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049416040822 0.056905535591 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.