You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Many people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce more materials and goods.
To what extent do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal?
You should write at least 254 words.
Many resources of a nation include but is not limited to its people, culture and history. But the most important resource is the one that land beholds as a gift from nature and god. One way to exploits the natural resources is to produce and mine them as much as possible and export them to earn forgein currency. For example, counries like Japan and China has become known worldwide for producing and selling electronic goods. But is the result worth the trouble?
Firstly, consistantly mining and producing goods and materials have negative effect on nature. Frequent farming is also harmul to the ecology and evironment as the soil gets deplited of the nutrients and soil faunas die without them.
Secondly, more factories and mills will be needed and built and thus increasing the waste produced by them also. This is extreamly true in case of Bangladesh as it is one of the top textile manufacturer. So, just outside the Dhaka city, you can find more than 100 textile factories and mills and as a result the air and environment has become so polluted that it has been identified as one of the most unhabitable city on earth.
Thirdly, many countries has began extracting oil from the depth of the sea. As a result, the biodiversity of the sea has become disrupted and many species have become extinct as a outcome. Furthermore, now we can hear news about how oil tanks have spoilt the ocean water.
In conclusion, producing more goods is definitely a good sign more a country as it means now they can export those products for a hefty sum. But ultimate the nature has pay a price. So, maybe it is not such a good idea as we are also a part of nature.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...s increasing the waste produced by them also. This is extreamly true in case of Bang...
^^^^
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...and many species have become extinct as a outcome. Furthermore, now we can hear n...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63513513514 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53226080355 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570945945946 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0849451665 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.75 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124534319188 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0344481108392 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348841708854 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0635254264831 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305760644779 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.