You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 254 words.
Learning about the food, the science behind it, and the various way to make it edible is a great concern. Some people believe these are important skills and hence children should study about these, while others are in favor of putting more concentration on their other subjects. I believe in the latter notion as children will eventually learn about the foods with time as they will grow.
Knowledge about food, its ingredients, preparation, and the science behind every food is very unique. This is why it is really important for children to learn about these from early childhood. After all, it is the right choice and knowledge of our diet which keep us healthy and sound. For example, a child who knows how useful fresh fruits and vegetables are for us from childhood will always prefer to have these as snacks or lunch and dinner menu. Therefore, proponents of this side think pupils should expand their learning about food and food science through the school curriculum.
However, there are some other essential specialties of life which are already taught by the school curriculum. the main reason behind incorporating these subjects is to provide them with basic as well as advanced knowledge. To illustrate, a traditional school syllabus always teach mathematics to students through which children can learn the analytical ability, logical thinking, and reasoning. Like math, every subject taught by the school has practical implications later in their adult life. Moreover, studying such important subject matter from childhood leads them to a definite career path which has a profound effect on getting a good job. This is why it is imperative for children to study these subjects in school.
In conclusion, although people have different opinions on whether or not a child should study food or food science, or other fundamental topics in school, I believe in the second notion. There are tremendous benefits of studying these subjects as this will ultimately secure their future by selecting the career.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: VERY_UNIQUE[1]
Message: Use simply 'unique'.
Suggestion: unique
...n, and the science behind every food is very unique. This is why it is really important for...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...lready taught by the school curriculum. the main reason behind incorporating these ...
^^^
Line 7, column 59, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...hough people have different opinions on whether or not a child should study food or food scien...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... their future by selecting the career.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, really, second, so, therefore, well, while, after all, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18237082067 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60297747336 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547112462006 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9391010047 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5625 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283793939927 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925773571402 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686897399871 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180108244988 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329597845712 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.