Employers should pay young people the same salary as older colleagues doing the same job. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, business market is extremely competitive and almost all people try to get promotion in their job as well as better achievements. Among all the employees the young generation occupies more than 60% of the working environment. It is believed that young people should be paid the same salary as older colleagues. This will be proven by analyzing how motivation can boost young employees' efficiency and technology helps them to fulfill their task in a shorter time.
It is true that the importance of being experienced in working environment cannot be neglected and this is known as a key factor in promoting a skilled worker; however, young people are excessively interested in learning new skills to do their job in a better way. Besides, they are motivated to prove themselves to their managers and try to be inspiring, energetic and innovative to impress their colleagues and boss. Gradually, as time passes, they would learn an incredible amount and become a qualified worker and consequently they would accomplish their tasks with reasonable efficiency.
On the other hand, technology becomes part of our daily life and it dominates almost all aspects of human's lives. Young individuals try to keep pace of technology and make the most benefits of it at their job, while their older colleagues are out of touch with modern world and prefer to do their job in the traditional way. As a result, young people can do their duties in a shorter time and more precisely.
To sum up, although the importance of getting experience should not be underestimated by employers, they should pay salary based on the employees' result and merit. This will motivate young fellows to work harder and enhance their efficiency.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 385, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...nalyzing how motivation can boost young employees efficiency and technology helps them to...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, however, if, so, well, while, as a result, as well as, it is true, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0701754386 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85059161863 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557894736842 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1971708979 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.416666667 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205392297929 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841382620265 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873310354228 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129167708504 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039876861436 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.