Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.
To some people, the idea of languages extinction seems troublesome. To others, on contrary, languages dying off is nothing less than relief from the complexity of using them. Languages, as much as upsides they bring about to our lives, have made difficulties in cross-nation and within-nation communication.
A common language will take some of the stings out of the potential communication difficulties. Irrefutably, a shared language is understood by all engages parties, and hence, would avoid potential misinterpretations. Living in the global village is no longer a far-fetched dream, and today, more than ever, nations need to communicate effectively. Nations’ thoroughly-interlaced life aspects mandate using a shared language to facilitate cultural and financial exchanges. An error-free and effective communication can become a reality only if a shared language is put in use.
Furthermore, language diversity appears to be one of the key factors that remove a sense of unity from one nation. A sense of unity is often praised and fostered among citizens as it is one of the crucial elements that contributes to a nation’s thriving future. With the sense of unity phasing out, a nation may define itself as a collation of ethnical groups rather one united group which, unquestionably, will result in divergence of goals and ambitions. At some point, the lack of unity will bring about their downfall. Ergo, promoting a shared language will lead the nation toward a more fruitful future.
Communication is the sole purpose of language invention. In our today’s world, what we currently desperately require is effective cross-nation and within-nation communications. Having a few, but commonly-understood languages serve this purpose. Using a shared language has the benefits of avoiding misinterpretation in international interactions, as well as, fostering a sense of unity within nations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 29, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...cation. A common language will take some of the stings out of the potential communicati...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 479, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...itate cultural and financial exchanges. Furthermore, language diversity appears ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69111969112 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.67496180732 2.80592935109 131% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625482625483 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.391264577 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2666666667 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173346242127 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661234869365 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464808636035 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107191476198 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246364464472 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.