Fossil fuels (e.g. coals, oil and gas) are the main source of energy for most countries. However, alternative sources of energy (e.g. wind and solar) have been encouraged for use by some countries. To what extent is this a positive or negative development?
For many nations, thermal power is the primary source of energy. Nevertheless, some countries promote the use of other alternative sources of electricity. This essay believes that this school of thought is a positive trend inasmuch as the natural fuels are polluting the earth, and other substitutions will have zero effect on nature and work effectively.
Digging and burning natural fuels such as gas, charcoal, and crude oil, which are radically finite, is the leading cause of pollution. That is to say that, these substances are in the earth's core, and companies need to take them out and fire them up to generate heat to boil water. This is because the steam generated by the water will run the turbines, thus producing electricity. As a consequence, there is a disturbing by-product, which is known as CO2, and if produced in large quantities, it will lead to adverse effects. For example, the Texas State Electricity Board in the US produces 17 tons of carbon dioxide per day to satisfy the needs of its citizens.
By promoting clean and environmentally friendly energy sources, countries can help the environment. In other words, these power producing components are incredibly convenient to install, and they are significantly efficient in producing energy. The reason is that they use sun rays, water, and wind to generate power without harming nature, thereby helping the environment to sustain. For example, China is producing a solar power farm in 100 square kilometers, which can produce approximately one million megawatts power, which is sufficient for the whole country.
To conclude, I believe that the electricity produced by depleting natural resources spoils the environment, and the alternative sources of generating power is a positive development, as these approaches are not disturbing nature.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 3, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... satisfy the needs of its citizens. By promoting clean and environmentally f...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, so, thus, for example, such as, in other words, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35517241379 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99226311102 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8128078326 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.461538462 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165193572287 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592649989806 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480953167578 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105343793519 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578659058089 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.