The government should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The government must allocate funds on railway systems instead of highways. I partially assent with this proposed argument due to the fact that although transportation via train could be more convenient to many, vehicles still need improvement on roads.
Firstly, use of railways are faster and more reliable than using public roads. It could carry innumerable passengers altogether through scheduled departure and would arrive in one's desired destination on the right time. Seemingly, day-by-day may individuals come to work especially in dense areas that would result in traffic congestion. Hence, prioritizing railway projects and eventually building of such could certainly ease this problem.
Apart from this, the traveler could experience economical benefit when riding in a train. Evidently, fare cost for this type of transportation is a lot cheaper than riding on public or private vehicles. To illustrate this, a particular commuter would need not to have another ride for the reason that trains could carry them directly to their destination, whereas, for automobiles are only available along the road which travels only in specific locations.
On the other hand, government should also allocate a budget for developing road conditions. This is due to the fact that there are still insurmountable number of cars that are utilizing public highways. People have equal rights to travel safely as they pay taxes, thus, authorities should be deemed to spend fund on its repair if in case it becomes dilapidated.
To sum up, expenditures on railway projects is of paramount importance as well as to set aside budget for road improvement. This is reasonably feasible because the former provides comfort while the latter considers the other travelers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'have'?
Suggestion: have
...s, a particular commuter would need not to have another ride for the reason that trains...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, may, so, still, thus, well, whereas, while, apart from, as to, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44525547445 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90418317771 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653284671533 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3494369157 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.571428571 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0991904007883 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0368301049031 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410557691576 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0553492345723 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289646509561 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.