Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
We, the 21st generation, are way more mobile than previous generations of ours. Today that we are dealing with excessive air pollution, congested freeways and the fuel price soaring, choosing the best transportation system to invest in has raised some controversies. My firm conviction goes with railway expansion as it would address some of our today’s challenges.
Capable of carrying numerous passengers at a time, unquestionably, trains elbow aside cars when it comes to efficiency. Thousands of cars being trapped in the traffic jam has turned into an everyday scene in most metropolitans. These personal vehicles, if fully utilized, can fit five passengers top. On the other hand, trains offer a greener, more sustainable means of transportation with which hundreds of these people can take a trip. Ergo, not only would railway expansion alleviate the traffic, but it would also participate in combatting against air pollution.
Trains are believed to be the safest means of transportation. With all the advancement we have made in making our cars safe, there are still heart-rending accidents which result in casualties ranging from small injuries to lethal ones. On contrary to cars, trains accidents are very rare which is a reliable indicator of their safety. Hence, with investing in railways more people can travel harm-free.
In conclusion, I believe that with more trains around, we may at least be able to make a small dent in ever-mounting traffic and its inevitable consequence, the air pollution. Moreover, we can avoid or at least lower the frequency of car accidents by offering a more reliable transportation system.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, moreover, so, still, at least, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32183908046 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11529360442 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647509578544 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2097967766 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2142857143 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.060648547316 0.244688304435 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.023872500625 0.084324248473 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0296883000596 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0396174947781 0.151304729494 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0101096639516 0.056905535591 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.