It is better for boys and girls to study separately rather than study in mixed sex
classes. They are less distracted and this leads to better results.
Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
To begin with the tendention of single gender education it is not a new. It was popular couple hundreds years ago in some countries of Europe, but now it coming back and became like a mainstream in our country and abroad. As for me, I partly agree with this opinion. So, let us discuss the problem, and try to find a consensus.
In my opinion the separetely studying for boys and girls can have a positive results. If we have a look in some sceintists practice and knowledge about structure and princeples of work psychological system and brain, we can find differences between mans and womens. For example, for better understanding of topics or different subjects for mens brain better use some practice and examples, but womens brain can understand and build the picture or this subject inside withiut any examples. Like we can see if use this principle of differences between brains we can create school educational program for boys and girls separeletly, they will understand better and quolity of education can rised up.
Hovewer this practice can also has negative sides. It is a not possible to drow up straight line between psychological behavior boys and girls. All the people are different, some children quaet some loud, the ones like math but another prefer reading or studying different languages and this differens not depend from gender. So if we separated boys and girls to different classes and prepared for them individual studying plan it can lead to situation when some children in both groups or classes can feel werse to compared with mixed gender class, and show low results in education.
In conclusion, for the last couple decades we lost institution of family, because most parents have not enough time for children and try to put responsibility of educate for school. I spose the best way for children it is studying in mixed classes and to begin to learn about relation between genders from childhood and build the model of communication. Also parents should spend more time with their kids and help them to orientate in sicium.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...on of single gender education it is not a new. It was popular couple hundreds years a...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roblem, and try to find a consensus. In my opinion the separetely studying fo...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d quolity of education can rised up. Hovewer this practice can also has negat...
^^^
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...p. Hovewer this practice can also has negative sides. It is a not possible to...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., and show low results in education. In conclusion, for the last couple decad...
^^^
Line 7, column 358, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...d and build the model of communication. Also parents should spend more time with the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, as for, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 10.4138276553 269% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92550143266 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67719621585 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553008595989 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.8665004983 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.6 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24092749507 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822908644892 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690655489962 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13566923696 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420868496198 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.