It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Undoubtedly, Understanding the analogy between good and bad things are of significant and inevitable importance in the child’ early stage of life. However, the issue is not entirely straightforward, although arguments can also be made against the idea. In this essay, the debate will be discussed, and will be given a concluding view.
On the one hand, proponents who support the idea of using penalty as a method of teaching to help children establish differentiation between ethical and unethical values cite various benefits, it can bring to the children. Firstly, Penalty can facilitate some fear in the mind of the children especially the young children while it can help to keep them away from the unethical and immoral activities. Secondly, Fear brings a radical change in the neurological brain of the children, by making them more disciplined and well-behaved. In addition to this, it can also enhance and improve not only their academic life but can create plethora of job opportunities for them. For instance, a study made by the WEF shows that 50% of the children who are self-disciplined and time-bound achieve a great deal of success instead of the ones who do not possess these skills.
On the other hand, opponents point out their view that frequent punishments can produce a catastrophic effect on the life of the kid which can make them more reluctant and hostile to the circumstances. For instance, in school if the teacher penalises a child for any wrong doing, then it not only erodes the self-esteem of that pupil but also increases the likelihood of his committing a suicide. Secondly, If the punishments did not occur in a well-behaved and controlled environment than it can damage the relationship between guardians or teacher and children. Thirdly, Children would become more dependent on their parents and teachers and would have less confidence on them because they are unable to generalize the circumstances by themselves whether it is right or wrong for them.
Overall, it seems reasonable to carry out penalty on kinds under the guidance and supervision of either parents or teacher while helping children to elucidate in brief the dissimilarity between good and bad activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 91, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helping'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'teach' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: helping
...f using penalty as a method of teaching to help children establish differentiation betw...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nes who do not possess these skills. On the other hand, opponents point out t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, well, while, for instance, in addition, in brief, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18559556787 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06175519708 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554016620499 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.9734992814 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.0 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7692307692 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6153846154 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178756493697 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614853647371 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0255982734014 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0968813120909 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329667182917 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.