Leaders of the younger generation are excelling in all fields than in the past. What are the reasons for this? Is this positive or negative development.
Young people are in top position in today’s era than in the past, which is due to the technological development and better knowledge. It has some benefits as well as drawbacks, for the society that younger people are leaders which are better for the successful future for them and the country, but they might lack experience which is the main problem.
Firstly, young people are aware of most of the new technological knowledge and they are fast learner so they have more capacity than other people. Technological development is the key which is required in the entire sector which helps for more production of goods and services. For example, employees of Qatar Airways are from new generation to old generation and they are equally competent as the old employees when they get better training and development at their workplace.
Secondly, the new generation has greater knowledge due to the social media and the internet which they use from their school days which is helping them to gain more knowledge. Most of the younger people use Google to search for information which is of their interest and whenever they have any problem which helps in finding most of the solution on the internet. For instance, young people use internet technology which helps them to gain more knowledge than in the past days.
Finally, young people might fail due to lack of experience which one of the major concerned, however, if they get the right platform to showcase their talent they can be the successful leader. Their parents can guide them choose their career and motivate them, which will definitely lead them to succeed in their life.
In conclusion, young people should be given better training in their respective field which will increase their performance for their better future in their field.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or their better future in their field.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05333333333 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58128951409 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.5655093111 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.818181818 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1818181818 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109138027626 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550034660886 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036822297438 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0737143317974 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437020295126 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.