In many countries it is now illegal to smoke in public places. It is only fair that people who wish to smoke should have to leave the building. Do you agree or disagree?
Give reason for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
"Smoking" is indisputably a poison, but still practised by humans ubiquitously. Several states have adopted pragmatic approaches in order to curtail this toxin from society. I am in consummate accord with the strategies introduced by few states, declaring smoking as an unlawful act. However, others believe that one should avoid smoking publicly or in a gathering.
Smoking generates tremendous profound and detrimental effects on humans. As a result, this action is now officially declared against the law in enormous places worldwide. This practice does not generates any optimistic effects, despite of degenerating personality and health. For instance, numerous studies have consistently found that smokers possess no personal or professional life and spend major part of their lives in rehabilitation centres. Moreover, various governing bodies have pragmatically adopted norms and regulations to cease this act, followed by heavy fine and imprisonment in case of violation of rules.
Education has incubated awareness among society regarding injurious effects of smoking. In addition, high nicotinic contents in cigarettes has drastic effects on brain resulting addiction, nervous and respiratory degenerative disorders. Moreover, a person person coming in contact with cigarette smoke is likely to be affected in the same manner as the one consuming it. Such a phenomenon is termed as "passive smoking". For example, recent research survey concluded that about 45% of humans are affected by cigarette contents in same way as consumers because they become passive smokers by coming in contact with smoke. As a result of these alarming facts, citizens greatly prefers that the person who wishes to smoke should practice this act in isolation or away from gatherings in order to avoid disturbing ambiance of that particular place.
In conclusion, taking the inevitable and notorious results of cigarette consumption into consideration majority of states have banished this unlawful act. Furthermore, some hold firm believe that such acts should certainly be practised privately rather than socially.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'generate'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: generate
...laces worldwide. This practice does not generates any optimistic effects, despite of dege...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'generate'
Suggestion: generate
...laces worldwide. This practice does not generates any optimistic effects, despite of dege...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: person
...ory degenerative disorders. Moreover, a person person coming in contact with cigarette smoke ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79299363057 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13299567395 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656050955414 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6476652476 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4705882353 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130930301302 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041221267854 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340410265545 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0762511468399 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303380482471 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.