Many criminals re-offend after they have been punished. Why do some people continue to commit crimes after they have been punished, and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem?

It is common knowledge that nowadays a great number of ex-convicts carry out new offences after being released from prison. Which circumstances lead them to repeat their offences is a hotly-debated topic that often divides opinions. This essay will first address which are the reasons that result in this situation, followed by some proposals to end up with this problem.
One of the main problems that are currently affecting our societies is the “tough on crime”. In my opinion, measures such as imprisonment, parole or halfway houses are nowadays overused and they are not achieving its main objective which is the offenders´ reintegration. Conversely, they spark the opposite effect. One such instance could be the United States, which has the highest incarceration rate in the world, whilst it has also the highest number of re-offenders.
Furthermore, the government sponsored awareness campaigns are not reaching the key population, due to the fact that they are using the wrong channels to connect with them. If every measure is spread through mass media or lectures are given in state buildings, it will be difficult to have people, such as drug dealers, gang leaders or murderers listening to them.
It is my firm belief that societies can only avoid this controversial issue building community. Firstly, we must change their perception of being out of the community. This aiml could be reached through changing incarceration measures to performing community services. Moreover, it would be advisable to speak to them face-to-face in their neighborhoods with a view to avoiding bias against police or state representatives. This would be the perfect channel to contact them and make them aware of the situation.
In conclusion, only a few changes could produce a dramatic turn of events, if the authorities are able to make them feel part of our communities.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ences after being released from prison. Which circumstances lead them to repeat their...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28571428571 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07049365071 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604651162791 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1949295693 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.066666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158767238084 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492137707506 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0282872427713 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0733089621606 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378393840529 0.056905535591 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.