Many People think that too much attention and resources are given to protection of wild animals and birds.Do you agree or disagree?!

Essay topics:

Many People think that too much attention and resources are given to protection of wild animals and birds.

Do you agree or disagree?!

There are a great deal of people think that the most concentarion and different recources are provided to save wild and animals and birds. Therefore, I disagree with with this statement. So, I will mention here the details.

First of all, we can not ignore that wild animals are important of our life. However, protecting from animal and birds extinction is our responsibility. As we should not say that all the focus are valid to support nature recources only. So, government is working to make a balance in all areas of its country. For example, it works to conserve ecosystem from being destroyed. In addition, it saves our life from others passive objects like fossil fuel emmsion, as it pushes the public to use alternative choices to save human's life. It means, that there is no doubts, that government cares about other matters.

Furthermore, people must not think in that way, which it is not logical at all. If people think about this method, so who will care about other activities. Education is aslo supported by the government. It has worked to improve its education system by offering the best ways to enure quality of life. Hence, so many people seek to a better education for their children. Knwong, it looks for developing public services, as well as saving from being vandalised. Whereas, it keeps paying attention to be in a good image, so every single person in the country can take a proper service. In addition, they could have benefits from it.

To sum up, paying too much attention and recources to protection are not bad at all. In this reason. As wild animals are the one which we rely on. There are a growing number of animals get extincted because of human misuse towards it.

Votes
Average: 4.8 (4 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 19, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deals'?
Suggestion: deals
There are a great deal of people think that the most concentar...
^^^^
Line 2, column 162, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: with
...nimals and birds. Therefore, I disagree with with this statement. So, I will mention here...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 154, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...birds extinction is our responsibility. As we should not say that all the focus ar...
^^
Line 4, column 549, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are no doubts'?
Suggestion: there are no doubts
...ces to save humans life. It means, that there is no doubts, that government cares about other matt...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 102, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ion are not bad at all. In this reason. As wild animals are the one which we rely...
^^
Line 8, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eason. As wild animals are the one which we rely on. There are a growing number o...
^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...because of human misuse towards it.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, whereas, for example, in addition, no doubt, as well as, first of all, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79124579125 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56061878922 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585858585859 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8210712974 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 64.6818181818 106.682146367 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.5 20.7667163134 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68181818182 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186065574898 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480634472736 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608875776552 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126590028152 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565611788971 0.056905535591 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.0946893788 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 50.2224549098 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.91 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.