Marriages are bigger and more expensive nowadays than in the past. Why is this the case? Is it a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, People are more interested in holding fashionable wedding ceremonies and they spend a big amount of money for celebrating their marriage parties, while it was totally different in the past. There are several reasons for this scheme and I believe that the disadvantages by far outweigh the advantages.
There are some determinant factors that cause expensive marriages become more popular among people. Firstly, the families try to show off in the society and show their wealth, authority and fame to the other people. Take prominent Hollywood actors for example, who like to be on the tabloids or on the News and by holding the expensive parties can increase their popularity among their advocates. Secondly, trendy wedding parties are more appealing to the young couples and they like to pursue the latest fashions and trends and are interested in spending expenditures on the dress, cake, international cuisines and the like. Finally, Life was much simpler in the past and there was not a variety of options for individuals to opt.
I strongly believe that this trend is negative and it had some detrimental effects on society. For example, getting married becomes more complicated especially for those who are not wealthy enough to hold such parties with a big amount of expenditures. Besides, the marriage average age will arise and we will see that less people are interested in getting married. Consequently, there would be a wide generation gap between parents and children as a result of increasing in marriage age.
To sum up, holding marriage parties are more intricate than in the past and it had deterring effects on getting married. Consequently, it will lead to some difficulties in the society which should be addressed by government authorities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...age age will arise and we will see that less people are interested in getting marrie...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, as to, for example, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19097222222 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83649529107 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6475688335 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162985743395 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590358495444 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517399501614 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103963471276 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0131983733125 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.