Spending leisure time with families, is becoming less and less among adolescents. There are two main reasons for this issue, including gap generation, and social media, which caused some misunderstandings between families and youths. Although teenagers don’t have a lot of problems with this behavioral change, psychologists believe that negative emotional effects caused by this change will be enormous.
Over time, the gap between generations grows deeper and deeper. The reason for this can be considered the dramatic speed and momentary progress of technology. One of the most well-known changes in the development of technology is the emergence of social media, which is the previous generation could not communicate well with it, while most teens are completely dependent on it, they spend most of their time on social media. Most reports show that Teens spend more than 7 hours on screens for entertainment a day, so in this regard, recent studies illustrate teens’ screen time doubled over the last 4 years.
Most young people prefer to spend time with social media’s entertainment and believe that spending time in the virtual world is very useful, and also helps keep people's awareness up to date. In contrast, psychologists say this behavioral change is very harmful and may cause many mental and emotional problems for teenagers and their families. They believe that traditional communication between young people and adults, especially parents, not only maintains the sprits fresh but also controls people's stress and mental health. For instance, it is proved that families who have at least one reunion per month, have a higher pappiness index among others don’t have. As can be seen, positive sides are more outweigh than negatives.
Today, young people spend less time with their families. There are many reasons for this, such as a lack of mutual understanding due to generation gaps and rapid technological advances. In this essay, it was stated that although this issue is justified for many young people, but for many scientific experts, this change in the way of spending leisure time is rejected.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, well, while, at least, for instance, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28318584071 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74163043597 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557522123894 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8386260787 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.4 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21085994453 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769608833569 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466101758732 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137699930979 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026735007142 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.