In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In the economic structures of many countries in the world, it is observed that a huge deviation exists among the salary structure of the employees. Some employees usually earn extremely high salaries, whereas, many other have lower pay scales. Some people consider it a positive sign for a country but some refute this and proclaims that government should have limitize the salaries amount. I will discuss both opinions in my Essay.
On the one hand, it is believed that earning higher levels of salaries by individuals is beneficial for country, government and the individuals earning it. Moreover, if an employee reaches the top limits of pay/salary scale that means he/she deserves it and company values his/her competences and experience. For Instance, we consider cement sector and taking real life example of D.G. Khan Cement Company, which is indeed the second largest cement producing company in Pakistan. By analyzing pay structure, it is observed that an electrical engineer is earning approximately half a Million Rupees a month but a Manager Finance usually earns half of it while being on the same position in terms of grade. It is because of the fact that an electrical engineer is technical person and spends more of his time outdoor and believed to be a key person in the plant. Subsequently, he deserves more salary/compensation.
on the other hand, many people believe that there has to be a limit over the remunerations paid to employees and government should back/organize the same. Furthermore, by sealing the pay scale or by limiting the amount, almost all the employees of any organization would be benefited as the pay scale of the people with lower salaries will be improved. For Instance, MCB Bank Limited is largest financial institution in Pakistan. In addition, the same approach can be observed in this organization as the model discussed earlier is well implemented in this esteemed Bank. Resultantly, the employees working in this Bank are very much satisfied, motivated and contented. On the top of it, the Bank is growing at a rapid pace and earning huge profits as well as paying more than 3 Billion Rupees as Tax to Government of Pakistan.
In a nutshell, it can be said that the both approaches are logical and beneficial in many contexts. But in my opinion, the proper distribution of wealth is always a better approach and provides benefits to more and more people. As a result, the employers, employees, companies and governments all gets benefited.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 712, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
... same position in terms of grade. It is because of the fact that an electrical engineer is technical per...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
... deserves more salary/compensation. on the other hand, many people believe tha...
^^
Line 5, column 385, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the largest'.
Suggestion: is the largest
...mproved. For Instance, MCB Bank Limited is largest financial institution in Pakistan. In a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, well, whereas, while, as to, for instance, in addition, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2093.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 412.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08009708738 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9668286996 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519417475728 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 659.7 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5141684547 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.157894737 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6842105263 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26315789474 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304072033204 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866905548739 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838443648204 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178990872366 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106762101017 0.056905535591 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.