Some people believe that certain old buildings are worth preserving more than other buildings.
🔸What type of old buildings are worth preserving? Do the advantages of preserving these buildings outweigh the disadvantages?
Write at least 250 words.
Some people assert that there some special historical relics which should be placed more important than others. Indeed, there are several sorts of documented manors for caring. Albeit the merits of keeping these structures are by no means negligible; but, in my opinion, its resulting merits undermine its negative sides.
Historical relics are varied from various aspects whether their antiquities or qualities. Simply put, among documented structures which have been carrying a nation’s civilization have value of preserving. Take institutional house in Tabriz as an example; This is the best place FOR FAMILIARIZING AND RISING AWARENESS OF NEXT GENERATIONS ABOUT CONSITUTIONAL ACTIVISMS AND THEIR DEDICATIONS by their old- time possessions such as their weapons and unpublished night letters. In addition, there are some historical buildings which have been ruined so that preserving of them comes at a huge cost. In some cases, these building are not valuable as much as conserving expenses.
Historical buildings are the icons of our heritage and preserving of them not only is every citizen’s commitment but also would be definitely bonus due to some rational reasons. Firstly, they are main places for introducing a nation’s culture which have been evolved over thousands of years. To put it differently, individual can be cognized from their roots by visiting museums and historical relics to find out about their mindset, ambitious and even challenges that they had tackled. Secondly, history always lays the groundwork for learning from past and using for future. Alternatively, historical buildings are the most powerful tools for achieving this long-held goal. For instance, Saad Abad Palace in Tehran, is a terrific example to illustrate that power and high-profile positions are short- live and a conscious person does not count on them at all.
To conclude, old- time buildings are not as matter as each other. Some of them which are holding long-time history or needing less money for renovation prioritize than others. From my prospect, by and large, the drawbacks of preserving documented relics are overshadowed by its abundance benefits like keeping society’s culture which its acquisition has been taking ages or using for taking relevant steps to have better tomorrow.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, in addition, such as, by and large, in my opinion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45378151261 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87828177204 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602240896359 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9396466929 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.529411765 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.70588235294 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170132514985 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638756317177 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077996101877 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107656826749 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031235472334 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.