Some people believe famous people's support towards international aid organisations draws attention to problems. Others think celebrities make the problems less important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In modern time, it is a very common scenario that a publicly renowned person, who can be player, film star, singer, writer etc., is keeping contribution to seek attention to various problems, which are important from humanitarian ground, on behalf of international assistance agencies. From my point of view, this type of activities is important to attract the attention of mass community and it does not lower the significance of problems which some may think of. To involve more people to listen a message to overcome difficulties, popular faces can function as a big spirit, which cannot be done through publishing news only.
Primarily, celebrities are the role model for general public, so when they share anything with their fans that generally get more importance. For example, football star Lionel Messi is the ambassador of UNICEF and whenever he comes with any message regarding the problems of children, it gets attention. It is not possible for other person to get the more limelight than this sports icon. So, without these stars’ support, international institutions who are working for human development will not get expected response.
On the other hand, sometimes it seems that celebrities are getting more attention than the problems. This may happen because when a star talks about something, it is very common that audience will be more interested to see their favorite person’s style and attitude rather than their information. But, this is not big deal in most of the cases. For example, when Hollywood film actress Angelina Jolie came to India to share information regarding woman’s health on behalf of an international organization. When she arrived there people were busy with taking photos with her but later she was successful to do her job.
To conclude, conveying information to get a solution of a problem is important and stars always keep contribution regarding this matter. Sometimes, stardom may create some hindrance but it does not affect much. After various analysis, I can say that popular people always play a great role to draw consideration to the problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ily, celebrities are the role model for general public, so when they share anything with their...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...son to get the more limelight than this sports icon. So, without these stars' sup...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, regarding, so, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22580645161 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9028051474 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595307917889 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.384769539078 780% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9437813047 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.8 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7333333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.93333333333 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148929293966 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500926993122 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383103375238 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0896216016619 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188930337226 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.