Some people believe that it is wrong to keep animals in zoos, while others think that zoos are both entertaining and ecologically important. Discuss both views.
Nowadays, protecting the wildlife is underestimated by governments in some countries which will be devastating in the future. Meanwhile zoos play an important role in wildlife conservation. It is believed by a group of people that it is cruel to keep animals in zoos, others however refute this. Both points of view will be discussed.
There are some persuasive arguments in favor of keeping animals in zoos. From the environmental perspective, they can protect the endangered species and give scientists the chance to study their behavior. From the economical point of view, they employ the large number of people which provide great job opportunities and income for the local area. In addition, zoos are entertaining, educational and fun. They can make a fantastic day out for a family to have fun and children learn to respect and protect the nature and wildlife.
On the other hand, there are some strong arguments against keeping animals in cages for entertainment. Based on the moral point of view, keeping animals in cages is unethical and we have no right to use animals for entertainment. In addition, Zoos exhibit animals with the aim of making profit. According the environmental aspect, zoos are artificial so animals lose their instinct for hunting. Furthermore, It would be better to protect the animals' natural habitat to reduce the risk of their extinction.
To sum up, although zoos are entertaining and educational for children, they will change the animals' instinct which seems not to be rational. It would be better to protect the preserved areas to keep animals safe.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...hich will be devastating in the future. Meanwhile zoos play an important role in wildlife...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: CHANCE_CHANGE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'change'?
Suggestion: change
...angered species and give scientists the chance to study their behavior. From the econo...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e preserved areas to keep animals safe.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, while, as to, in addition, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15384615385 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93349358537 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542307692308 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0894745205 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.75 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230708132781 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838255587922 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700923197218 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144771667942 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494426358772 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.