Some people believe that to learn the way other cultures live it is better to watch films or video programs. Others believe that it is better to read books and newspapers. To what extent do you agree or disagree with these statements? Give your own opinion and examples.
Learning host country culture has been in the headlines for decades. Some feel that it is easy by reading journals and newspaper. However , I agree with those who say that its better to learn through flicks. In this essay, I will examine both side and give my opinion.
As for those who believe that learning a culture lives of host country is better by reading newspapers and books, they believe in this way because if we look at the recent victory of Trump's in USA, we can easily identify how it's policies going to raise the living standard. For instance in his agenda he promise of stopping of outsourcing of work, which means more Americans' get job and earn well. In addition he reduces taxes for companies. According to a recent study by JP Morgan reveals that reducing tax will bring down prices and people have more money power in their hands.
In contrast, other people who hold the notion that to learn other culture lives through flicks and video programs. This is because by looking at the movies or their local TV shows we got an idea about their culture, their feelings which they express. According to a study by University of Oregon which revealed that those who try to learn through videos are quick in learning. The same study reveals that if people learn in this way it is easy for both countries citizens to work together.
In sum, if everyone think in a manner that they can learn host country culture easily through flicks and videos, I hope in future we will not committee any mistake which feel offended to them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to host'
Suggestion: to host
Learning host country culture has been in the headlin...
^^^^
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... reading journals and newspaper. However , I agree with those who say that its bet...
^^
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... examine both side and give my opinion. As for those who believe that learning a...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'promises'.
Suggestion: promises
...standard. For instance in his agenda he promise of stopping of outsourcing of work, whi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...ore Americans get job and earn well. In addition he reduces taxes for companies. Accordi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 582, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e have more money power in their hands. In contrast, other people who hold the n...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 59, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to host'
Suggestion: to host
...e think in a manner that they can learn host country culture easily through flicks a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, well, as for, for instance, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63503649635 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2476022118 2.80592935109 80% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56204379562 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.022382413 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6923076923 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197822599551 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711659312646 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767611081077 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116226290722 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494460849604 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.