Some people say that in all levels of education from primary schools to university too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills. Do you agree or disagree?
Now a day, learning facts and practical skills both are equally important in education. But many people argue that from basic to higher education ample time is spent on learning fact compare to practical skills which are equally imperative. I agree with the statement that less time given on practical skills in compare to learning facts.
Firstly, the curriculum of schools revolved around the learning fact. Like the subject which we study during our schools, For example math’s, science, history etc are more of theoretical subject not the practical one. Practical subject like drawing, social activity are always missing from year syllabus of primary school. Even in university also they give more attention on learning fact compare to practical skills. For instance, if someone wants to become a doctor he just needs a book but when it come to practical knowledge he need a proper setup of hospital with patients. And all this cost a huge amount of investment because of that universities always ignore the practical knowledge.
Moreover, the teachers in schools as well as in universities are more focus in completing the syllabus. And the reason being they ignore the practical skills. The humongous curriculum is given to teacher at start of the year, and they have to complete the syllabus by end of the year. In that hurry they ignore the practical skills is always leave behind. For instance, during our college our teacher always misses the chemistry practical class because teacher is behind the schedule to complete the theoretical class.
In conclusion, I opine that both practical and theoretical knowledge is important to be successful in life. Educational system must be change to give equal value to both of them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 507, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comes'?
Suggestion: comes
...doctor he just needs a book but when it come to practical knowledge he need a proper...
^^^^
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'leaved', 'left'.
Suggestion: leaved; left
...y ignore the practical skills is always leave behind. For instance, during our colleg...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 520, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dule to complete the theoretical class. In conclusion, I opine that both practic...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16549295775 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67198309352 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531690140845 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4719448755 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6875 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261700624718 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095237177645 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781445613567 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150193086393 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101583998593 0.056905535591 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.