Technology development has made the traditional skills and ways of life die out

Essay topics:

Technology development has made the traditional skills and ways of life die out

Technology up-gradation brought enormous changes in life, consequently life style and conventional skills have also been impacted significantly. I shall explain the why this has happened in essay.

Many people believe that modernization of technology generated so many jobs in every sector and skills required to do these jobs are completely different than conventional skills. For example, computer programming is one of the new area of employment in modern era and it is also true that blend of skills such as coding, analytical, imagination are pre-requisite for these kind of jobs which are completely in contrast to old skills like preparing document or tying, file work etc. Furthermore, so many skills have also becoming redundant because of new technology adaptation at work places. Nowadays, manufacturing companies rarely hire the worker for manufacturing and most of the work is done by the machine or recently introduced robots.

The effect is not limited to skills but even way of life changed up to large extent. In pre modernization era, people relied on the manual work and most of the work at house or in general were carried out by the human being. For instance, people used to wash their cloths, utensils and other chorus work on its own, however, post technology era, all these works are done either by the machine or major assistance is given by the various machines. Moreover, cooking style and eating pattern have altered and now people do not extensively cook but prefer the ready to cook or processed food for consumption.

In conclusion, Skills have always been important to lead good life but technology implementation have made the tradition skills outage and generating the demand of new tech based skills which in turn changing the traditional life style in every country.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (3 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'why'?
Suggestion: why
...impacted significantly. I shall explain the why this has happened in essay. Many peo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
... do these jobs are completely different than conventional skills. For example, compu...
^^^^
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...ical, imagination are pre requisite for these kind of jobs which are completely in contras...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 483, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...paring document or tying, file work etc. Furthermore, so many skills have also be...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in general, kind of, such as, in contrast to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12837837838 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84987793364 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577702702703 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.9990554836 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.0 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9090909091 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.9090909091 7.06120827912 211% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244932897096 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894073120612 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952539332149 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165795237844 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0880492686115 0.056905535591 155% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.