Today much of the food people eat gets transported from farms that are thousands of miles away. Some people believe it would be better for the environment and the economy if people only consumed food produced by local farmers.
Would the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
In the salad days of the millennium, society is polarized into two groups almost equally regarding the notion that importing food from foreign country is not beneficial for environment as well as for economic growth of local farmers. The following paragraphs would shed some light on both the approaches of the argument before making a final note.
To begin with import of food this may increases the business with other nations, and opens new ways of exposure in the international market. But it impacts the financial growth of local farmers which is a major drawback. Farmers play a vital role in any country and hence their well-being and economic growth should also be considered before making any such international business deals. For instance, in recent past in India many farmers committed suicide because of their financial crisis. These situations can be avoided if local farmers profit margins are considered.
Secondly, eatable products which get imported are mostly of premium quality but not organic as well as treated with chemicals to make it long lasting where as if we consume the food products from local farmers they will most likely be organic and more healthier. As it takes time to transport food products from one end of the world to the another end therefore chemicals are used on them, where as this is not needed if we consume the local organic products.
Lastly, advantage of transported food is that we can get a variety of products which might not available in out country, plus availability in all season. Although behind this a huge amount of natural resources are being consumed to make this possible. Hence, we are paying a higher cost for this.
After noting all the points I strongly believe that imported food is a problem for any nation until they are not able to produce it themselves. Otherwise this is the thing which can be minimized in order to maintain a better future for farmer citizens and environmental surroundings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 151, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
... with chemicals to make it long lasting where as if we consume the food products from lo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 248, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'healthier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: healthier
...rs they will most likely be organic and more healthier. As it takes time to transport food pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 391, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...d therefore chemicals are used on them, where as this is not needed if we consume the lo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 155, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...untry, plus availability in all season. Although behind this a huge amount of natural re...
^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 145, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
... are not able to produce it themselves. Otherwise this is the thing which can be minimize...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, lastly, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as for, for instance, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01515151515 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63881634427 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.625280122 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.214285714 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237280348397 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770036978574 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344790330113 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131958941243 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292526268227 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.