When families have a meal together it is considered social activity. Do you think eating
together is important to people in your country?
It is irrefutable that eating together is a social activity. Sharing dinner together gives
everyone a sense of identity. It can help ease day-to-day conflicts, as well as establish
traditions and memories that can last a lifetime.
The first and foremost advantage of eating together is that it creates a sense of belonging.
Conversations during the meal provide opportunities for the family to bond and learn from
one another. It’s a chance to share information and news of the day, as well as give extra
attention to your children and teens. Family meals foster warmth, security and love, as well
as feelings of belonging. It can be a unifying experience for all.
Secondly, family mealtime is the perfect opportunity to teach appropriate table manners,
etiquette, and social skills. Parents can be perfect role models in this and children learn by
following them. What is more, meals prepared and eaten at home are usually more
nutritious and healthy. They contain more fruits, vegetables, and dairy products along with
additional nutrients such as fiber, calcium, vitamins A and C, and folate.
Furthermore, research shows that frequent family dinners (five or more a week), are
associated with lower rates of smoking, drinking, and illegal drug use in pre-teens and
teenagers when compared to families that eat together two or fewer times per week. To
add to it, children do better in school when they eat more meals with their parents and
family.
In my country most people do value shared mealtime. However, the fast paced life and
influence of the global culture is taking some away from this custom. Fortunately, some
recent studies have shown that even in the developed countries people are realizing the
importance of family meals and are downshifting. It is indeed time to bring the "family" back
to the dinner table.
To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that eating together is definitely an important
social activity. That it why it has been said that, ‘The family that eats together stays
together’.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 25, column 71, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... even in the developed countries people are realizing the importance of family meals and are...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, such as, as well as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83698244403 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60119047619 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9249095714 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 24.0 4.38176352705 548% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282428551344 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775094576428 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703998189696 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0639215275965 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632473526869 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.