cause of harm on earth
Our planet is the most important part of our existence. Without the Earth, there is no humanity. Some people feel that human activity is damaging our precious planet. Others disagree. In my view, human activity has harmed the Earth more than it has helped for two important reasons.
The first is pollution. Everyday we drive our cars to work and to other locations. These cars produce gas that damages the air. Everyday we use an enormous amount of plastic that damages our oceans. For example, I try to take responsible action, but 5 days a week I drive to work and put a large amount of carbon dioxide into the air, which is warming our planet to an unhealthy amount. I drink water to be healthy, but use plastic water bottles. I recycle the plastic, but the plastic is made by companies that damage the environment in the process. I am just one person among billions who commits similar actions everyday. As you can see, human activity is harming our planet.
Second, our activity puts all life in danger. Our desire to protect ourselves causes destruction across the planet. For example, during World War II, the nuclear bomb was invented and used to put an end to the war. Many countries built this weapon for protection against other nations that possess it. Though there is strong debate about whether this is right or wrong, this weapon when used can completely destroy our planet and when it was used has significantly damaged the environment. This clearly demonstrates that human activity has damaged the Earth and can, ultimately, completely destroy it.
In sum, our actions do damage the Earth. Not only do we pollute our planet, but our activity also puts all life in danger. We should all work to limit our negative impact.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as helped for two important reasons. The first is pollution. Everyday we driv...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 25, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[1]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective, and the comma is missing. Did you mean 'every day, we'?
Suggestion: Every day, we
...easons. The first is pollution. Everyday we drive our cars to work and to other loc...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 129, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[1]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective, and the comma is missing. Did you mean 'every day, we'?
Suggestion: Every day, we
... cars produce gas that damages the air. Everyday we use an enormous amount of plastic that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 552, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... damage the environment in the process. I am just one person among billions who c...
^
Line 6, column 616, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ng billions who commits similar actions everyday. As you can see, human activity is harm...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uman activity is harming our planet. Second, our activity puts all life in da...
^^^^^
Line 12, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., ultimately, completely destroy it. In sum, our actions do damage the Earth....
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, for example, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 52.1666666667 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 302.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84768211921 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44602270231 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569536423841 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2887276225 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 66.5454545455 100.406767564 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.7272727273 20.6045352989 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.59090909091 5.45110844103 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 3.85842293907 415% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108869046819 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365514577855 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644526713794 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0727771448848 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048489149794 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 11.7677419355 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.