A company is going to give some money either to support the arts or to protect the environment. Which do you think the company should choose? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Both spend money to support art and spend money to protect the environment are advantageous for a company which wants to improve itself. However, to my way of thinking, to give money to art instead of environment is not my cup of tea. Thus, I prefer consuming money to environment as it is a better commercial advertisement, nature is more crucial than art and environment would sustain continuos development for the company.
Initially, commercial advertisement, absulately, has a significant role for a company’s improvement. People can access to art everywhere that they attend. Nevertheless, protection of environment is not an area which communities pay quite much attention these days. The company suffering to protect environment, appeals as a protector of nature life. Therefore, people having plans to work with the company, admire the company because of sustanibility it provides. For instance, the company that my uncle works for commenced a project to increase the amount of trees in a nearby forest. After this step, they captured slight increase with their popularity in their sector as the customers of them appriciated to this application considerably.
Moreover, art is not an abysmal advertisement factor but it is less important than environment for these days since sustainibility is a crucial phenemona for people. As people consume a lot of sources which are supplied from nature and don’t try to be productor and saver for natural life, environment is going on to be harmed by human being. Actually, it is not only a mission for companies, but it is a must for all people as well. Nonetheless, because the companies are affordable for supplying money for protection of environment, I believe that sustanibility of environment is more significant than giving money for art. I infer from that companies having enough money to transfer to environment, should give the priority of spending money to nature instead of art.
Another perspective which must be examined is that companies can improve their future plans by supporting environment. As it is well believed that the nature always supplies products and outputs, the companies consuming money for environment would create tramendous profit by using them. For instance, the companies would use the vegetables which are created in the gardens that they done to use for meals.
On the whole, environment is considerably crucial for nowadays. If the companies have plans to consume money for something, they should choose environment as it supplies sustanibility for the company, it is a good advirtesement way and it is more efficient than art.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Both spend money to support art and spen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...continuos development for the company. Initially, commercial advertisement, abs...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ated to this application considerably. Moreover, art is not an abysmal advertis...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ending money to nature instead of art. Another perspective which must be examin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dens that they done to use for meals. On the whole, environment is considerabl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 8.0752688172 334% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2213.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26904761905 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17195315982 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464285714286 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 707.4 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1773339603 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.65 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235940223396 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900765298092 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733502578678 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158308861337 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373601232769 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.