The arts are good ways to educate people to be more civilized and more inspiring, and the environment is the necessary element for people. If I have to choose between them, I will choose the environment. The company should give some money to protect the environment other than to support the arts.
First of all, the environment is necessary to the human being, but the arts are not. We all have to live in the Earth which is a destiny for us until now. If the environment is destroyed, we have to face up it and fix it, otherwise, we have to endure it and have terrible lives. For example, in China, there are lots of chemical factories, so the air is polluted. If a company can give money to deal with this issue, people living there will benefit a lot and have much better lives. On the other hand, if we already know that money is needed to protect the environment, we still give money to support the arts, which is totally improper. Because we assume to use the money to the most needed place.
Furthermore, giving money to protect environment could enhance the fame of the company. Every company needs good fame, so it could get support from people. Nowadays, there are lots of products for consumers to choose, the consumers tend to choose the products made by the company of good fame. if a company supports environment, once people know it, they will admire the company and buy more of its products.
At last, to help protect the environment is to help people. As mentioned before, people have to live in the environment. So a company helping with the environment is a company do good to people. It's a way to accomplish the company's social responsibility.
Money has a lot of functions. We should use it to the blade of the knife. Donation to protect the environment is one of the best ways to spending the money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The arts are good ways to educate people...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nment other than to support the arts. First of all, the environment is necessa...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 646, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rt the arts, which is totally improper. Because we assume to use the money to the most ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se the money to the most needed place. Furthermore, giving money to protect env...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...ducts made by the company of good fame. if a company supports environment, once pe...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... company and buy more of its products. At last, to help protect the environment...
^^^^
Line 4, column 199, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...ronment is a company do good to people. Its a way to accomplish the companys social...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sh the companys social responsibility. Money has a lot of functions. We should ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of the best ways to spending the money.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, so, still, for example, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 330.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54848484848 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60910498712 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448484848485 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 490.5 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6984435198 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.4761904762 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7142857143 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295100329617 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948093444033 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802467787469 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181678495948 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506026676746 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 11.7677419355 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.81 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.68 8.01818996416 83% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 86.8835125448 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.