Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the fact that state of art technologies has played a predominant role in people's life. Humankind seeks for finding new ways for improving their life and enjoy more. They found that the world should tolerate some changes for providing a life in serenity and tranquility. Not all people concur when this issue arises. To being cognizant to the logic behind those who endorse or repudiate the legitimacy of this contention, not having any biased perception, I presume that nowadays people are more lively and hopeful in comparing to the past because of huge alterations in the world. Among a plentitude of reason in support of this assertion, cutting-edge devices and advancement of human thinking power could be picked out for further analysis.
To commence with, a consensus has yet to be reached; however, regarding the advent of high technology for harnessing phenomena for peaceful and safe life by humans based upon the statistics of different general questionnaires in sundry countries people are unanimous about the conviction that human could make positive changes in the world for regulating life; moreover, they were interpreted different laws which they are has effected on the world. Thus, they prepare themselves for harmful effects and change its attitude for utilizing in desires. A vivid example can be given to shed light on what was elaborated above. For instance, today's modern countries use the wind power for producing electricity which they used for lighting and moving devices. To sum, they contribute in the world for easier life.
In addition to the reason raised above; developing human's mind could also substantiate the justifiability of the claim made at the outset of this essay. In conjunction with public belief, humankind based on experiences from long- term living on the earth and investigating them could extract profitable knowledge in various outlines. To elucidate on, they could solve different problems and acquire a lot of valuable experiences which it improves his/her thinking power. Furthermore, they develop their culture and educations for the better life in the big communities. The result of a study carried out by Rice University's graduate students unveiled the fact that humans' IQ in the U.S increase about 20 points on average in comparing to 100 years ago. The higher IQ give them the requirement for utilizing natural resources and possibilities in the world for being happy and lively.
Drawing upon the reasons, discreetly put, as far as my personal perspective on the topic is concerned, I reiterate that the rapid alteration in the world by the human could make them more enjoyable and leave them in serenity. It could be rise because of not only novel technologies but also improvement of human's intelligence.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 684, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...veiled the fact that humans IQ in the U.S increase about 20 points on average in ...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, for instance, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2350.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 456.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15350877193 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84274142761 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581140350877 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 754.2 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 89.8168959174 48.9658058833 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.684210526 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.89473684211 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117527084266 0.236089414692 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377635401211 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.026472747946 0.0737576698707 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0713063661512 0.150856017488 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035436711194 0.0645574589148 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 86.8835125448 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.