Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past.
Nowadays the world, which surrounded the people, is moving as fast as it can and no one can predict what will happen in a bit later. I definitely agree with that statement because of some reasons, which all over the world they are available. Those reasons involve: people are busier than before, variety of jobs in far distances, and the cost of life. As a result of them, people are living in unsatisfied condition and none of them can escape to another condition unless they just modified some aspect of it.
When it comes to this sentence "People are now busier than before.", Who can be disagree with the very reality of nowadays life? Suppose it, all members of a big city, are always running such as a real athlete who is participating in track and field, without any stops. People running to achieve their many different goals of their life but they do not have any time to spend with their triumphs of lives. On the other hand, in those small ones, the reality may be changed. Because of lacking time, people spend less time with their family, less fun, and any kinds of entertainment. Consequently, they cannot live satisfied or happy, because they do not have any time to live. The busier situation, the less satisfaction. It becomes a true reality in such a world.
The second reason is about job. By the time elapses, countries in all over the world were developing and named themselves industrial company. In this situation, the different kinds of job have been created. A person who worked in a small farm with their father, now must go far distances to have new opportunities. That person should kill his or her emotional sense and do the "right thing". Therefore, the people during the history were diverged instead of converging. So, the human soul is less emotional than before, hence they cannot be happy as simple as before.
At last but not least, the most important reason which accused to making such a world, is cost of life. As the world developed, the price of life is arising. So, people must work hard, for instance, some people have to have more than one job to cover their costs. This strategy does not let them to be a human, they are working like robots, which are soulless and without any abilities for thinking about their lives. Those ones are becoming more and more nervous and stressed out. Who can live happy in such a society, which is stuffed of members without any sense of humor or any or some features that may be a sign of alive person?
Consequently, the world, which most of the people love it, is going to be a fatal space for all of them. The people who are busy and do not have any time to say the lovely words to their family member, who are working in far from their origin, and who are just thinking about their daily costs, can never live happy and satisfy. On the other hand, in that time without any concerns about them, people were more friendly and more centralized than now. They were happier than who are living nowadays. So let's not take the blessing of a happier life for granted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... stops. People running to achieve their many different goals of their life but they do not hav...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 419, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'Those' instead.
Suggestion: Those
...ilities for thinking about their lives. Those ones are becoming more and more nervous and ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 503, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...appier than who are living nowadays. So lets not take the blessing of a happier life...
^^^^
Line 9, column 561, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...blessing of a happier life for granted.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, if, may, second, so, therefore, for instance, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 15.1003584229 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2528.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 548.0 407.700716846 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61313868613 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83832613839 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40948064841 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454379562044 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 800.1 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 12.0 3.08781362007 389% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7946833408 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2666666667 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315722603159 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801466355642 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661282361453 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186824142716 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059178824353 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.