do you agree or disagree with the following statement. it is better to finish a project completely and then begin another project than to work on two or more projects at the same time? you specific reasons and examples to support your answer
The essential question of the prompt of the question is about whether it better to finish a project completely and then begin a new one or work on two two projects at the same time. Certainly, some people, if asked, would agree to work on two or more projects at the same time to save money and time, while others would say that the question is double-edged due to a great deal of factors involved. As far as I am concerned, I agree that it is better to finish a product completely and then start work on another one. The basis for my views will be discusse in the following essay.
There is no doubt that some of the projects required a precise work and effort. A single mistake can ruin the project reputation if caution are not in effect. For example, in order to asseret that all cars produced are safe and reliable, Toyota car company gives each employee a single project at a time. Not only that but also give them the time needed to finish their project. Thus, this allow the employees to focus only on their project and make sure that the end of the project part is compatible with the standered. In other words, if the workers were busy with more than one task, they could losses their focus, make mistakes or produce low quality cars. Thus, this could significantly affect the company reputation and sales,
In addition to the previous point, working in more than one project could be deadly. A small mistake in medcation preparation could pose the patient to a great risk. For instance, Pharmacist who are involved in prescription preparation, tablet counts and patient counseling are required to double check every stap in the drug preparation process in to ensure patient safety. If they are distureped by different activities at the same time, like answering phone calls or handling cash regestered, they are more likely make mistakes that could have a great negative impact on their patients. Implement one project policy could lessen number of mistakes and ensure patient safety.
As a conclusion, we can safely say that even though that working on one project can be costly and time consuming, working on one project is better because it can prevent damage that may occur due to inability to focus on more than one project.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
As far as I am concerned, I agree that it is better to finish a product completely
As far as I am concerned, it is better to finish a product completely
will be discusse in the following essay.
will be discussed in the following essay.
if caution are not in effect
if cautions are not in effect
Sentence: Not only that but also give them the time needed to finish their project.
Description: The token that is not usually followed by a conjunction, coordinating
Suggestion: Refer to that and but
Sentence: Thus, this allow the employees to focus only on their project and make sure that the end of the project part is compatible with the standered.
Description: The fragment this allow the is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace allow with verb, present tense, 3rd person singular
Sentence: In other words, if the workers were busy with more than one task, they could losses their focus, make mistakes or produce low quality cars.
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to could and losses
Sentence: The basis for my views will be discusse in the following essay.
Error: discusse Suggestion: discuss
Sentence: For example, in order to asseret that all cars produced are safe and reliable, Toyota car company gives each employee a single project at a time.
Error: asseret Suggestion: assert
Sentence: Thus, this allow the employees to focus only on their project and make sure that the end of the project part is compatible with the standered.
Error: standered Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: A small mistake in medcation preparation could pose the patient to a great risk.
Error: medcation Suggestion: mediation
Sentence: For instance, Pharmacist who are involved in prescription preparation, tablet counts and patient counseling are required to double check every stap in the drug preparation process in to ensure patient safety.
Error: stap Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: If they are distureped by different activities at the same time, like answering phone calls or handling cash regestered, they are more likely make mistakes that could have a great negative impact on their patients.
Error: regestered Suggestion: registered
Error: distureped Suggestion: disturbed
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 7 2
-------------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 22 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 7 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 394 350
No. of Characters: 1808 1500
No. of Different Words: 197 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.455 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.589 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.397 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 122 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 88 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 52 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 29 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.176 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.595 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.824 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.319 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.513 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.11 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: two
...ely and then begin a new one or work on two two projects at the same time. Certainly, s...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...owing essay. There is no doubt that some of the projects required a precise work and ef...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'while', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'no doubt', 'in other words']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.237209302326 0.229887763892 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.151162790698 0.158761421928 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0860465116279 0.0866891130778 99% => OK
Adverbs: 0.046511627907 0.046263068375 101% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0348837209302 0.0685040099705 51% => OK
Prepositions: 0.13023255814 0.118717715034 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0325581395349 0.0351676179071 93% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.47613255826 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0325581395349 0.0309702414327 105% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => More particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.0976744186047 0.0887237588012 110% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0325581395349 0.0209618222197 155% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00697674418605 0.0139019557991 50% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2250.0 2387.08602151 94% => OK
No of words: 394.0 408.028673835 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71065989848 5.86048508987 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48200974243 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.324873096447 0.338922669872 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.238578680203 0.251872472559 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.139593908629 0.174417080927 80% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0837563451777 0.112833075102 74% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47613255826 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502538071066 0.524397521467 96% => OK
Word variations: 54.8414952331 59.2087087015 93% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6684587814 77% => OK
Sentence length: 24.625 20.5533526081 120% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9390843904 48.84282405 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.625 120.699889404 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 20.5533526081 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8125 0.644075263715 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 48.4828680203 45.7405998639 106% => OK
Elegance: 1.72 1.45489161554 118% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.466014356226 0.300154397459 155% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.141983757932 0.103427244359 137% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0995300749923 0.0752933317313 132% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.52114268944 0.497263757937 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.176266147261 0.151897553556 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182775193655 0.114077575197 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104753451518 0.0781384742642 134% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.322965478226 0.336927656856 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.108481857146 0.067059652881 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315362767577 0.210909579961 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126428846947 0.0618886996521 204% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8870967742 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.91756272401 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 8.42114695341 71% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.6433691756 81% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.