Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is time we all rely less on private motor vehicles to get around, and instead use other forms of transport. Use specific examples and details to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is time we all rely less on private motor vehicles to get around, and instead use other forms of transport. Use specific examples and details to support your answer.

For many years private transportation has been serve to people not only as a tool to commute, but also as a source of comfort. I personally disagree with the statement that people rely less on private motor vehicles. The reasons why I hold this stance will be elaborated in the paragraphs below.
One of the reason is that in some parts of the world people do not have any alternative to the private vehicles. For instance, those who live in the country side of the United Stated simply lack of any kind of transportation to substitute their own cars. There is no evolved public transportation system. If the government sponsors development of the public transportation in these areas, the individuals will have more feasibilities to move around. Despite on some advantages of using private cars, busses could help locals in situations when their own vehicles cannot be used, such as when it breaks down. To that end, certain groups of people in particular regions still depend on private vehicles tremendously.
Another reason is that people love comfort driving, which private motor vehicles enable to provide. Modern cars have a myriad of technology, which let people to enjoy driving. For example, today, almost all cars equipped with air-conditioners for maintaining temperature regiment, GPS- systems for navigating in the unfamiliar for drivers areas. Therefore, equipment of the contemporary motor vehicles makes the driving process marvelously pleasant, forcing people to purchase even more upgraded cars. If people give up on their own cars, they will lose these comfortable conditions, provided by personal vehicles. Although scores of social programs propagandize the decreasing of using private vehicles in order to protect our planet from pollutants, people continue driving their own cars in the same degree. So, advantages of using private cars overweight using of other types of transportation.
To recapitulate, I feel that nowadays frequency of using personal motor vehicles by humans is still enormous. This is because some areas lack of availability of other types of transportation and own cars provide people with highly comfortable and enjoyable conditions.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y comfortable and enjoyable conditions.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, i feel, in particular, kind of, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 344.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35755813953 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01476754501 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563953488372 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1804491967 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.388888889 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72222222222 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198922858591 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698183186055 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651629965707 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133412346748 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0132475411801 0.0645574589148 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.