Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People who have learned many different skills are more likely to succeed than those who focus on learning only one skill.
Form the broad perspective, in the current state of affairs we face, in which fierce competition become an integral part of the people's daily life, it is not far-fetched to presume that the path of success is closely associated with the individuals' approach in terms of treating with the matter of competition. However, whether having a wide array of skills instead of concentration on developing merely one particular ability plays useful role to that end is considered as a contentious issue. There is a growing segment of people who contend that the aforementioned mindset brings a variety of advantages for people. I personally repudiate this idea and in the ensuing paragraph, the rationale behind this opinion will be further elaborated.
First and foremost, the nature of modern jobs requires specific features. There is no denying to the point that by passing the time the jobs become more and more specialized. Indeed, companies are seeking for the employees who acquire certain skill in specific filed. Take an accounting as a career existing for at least two hundred years. Previously, accountants did all the financial tasks of the companies, from book keeping to preparing the financial statement or the tax reports. Conversely, nowadays, this simple job has been divided to rather broad branches in a way that the account receivable accountant does not allowed to do the duties assigned to tax officer. Admittedly, both narrowing the jobs into sub-categories and inclining the employers for recruiting professional personnel hinder people to get acquainted with various aspect of specific job. Therefore, having followed one skill, canny people stand a pretty good chance in their job.
Another vital point which should be taken into consideration is the limited time. Undoubtedly, whenever the issue of learning the skill comes into the debate, time has been accounted as the restrained factor. In fact, time has restricted the human options and imposed to make the decision based on the available choices. According to this issue that so time-consuming is the process of learning that it render individuals to concentrate on a certain skill in great depth. According to the latest research attributing to DR. Kevin Russ, a prominent and highly respected professor in Department of Sociology in Macquarie University, the sooner students choose their final filed, the more plausible to find the decent job or apprenticeship after the graduation. This probe provides further legitimacy for the idea that getting involved in a particular skill raise the opportunity to become prosperous in the future.
In this circumstance, it is more judicious to say that by picking up diverse skill people pass up their chance to achieve their intended targets. Not only does not this approach meet the companies' requirements, but also it is not applicable due to time constraint.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 622, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'allow'
Suggestion: allow
... account receivable accountant does not allowed to do the duties assigned to tax office...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 913, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ity to become prosperous in the future. In this circumstance, it is more judicio...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, however, if, so, therefore, at least, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2425.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27173913043 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96839925547 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584782608696 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 757.8 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0391314945 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.476190476 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9047619048 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195004607151 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504233744985 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494661889533 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10690553593 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177114133522 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 152.0 86.8835125448 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 10.002688172 205% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.