Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Though people already realized the importance of protecting the environment, it's unlikely that there'll be any difference.
Undoubtedly, keeping global environment from spoiling is one of the most topical issues nowadays. Due to the irreversibilty of the influences that people impose on their habitat which is earth planet, it’s importance has now become a more crucial topic. Although some don’t give any attention to their surroundings, many act conscientiously and take care of it efficiently.
To begin with, in many industrialized cities, efforts to help take care of living environment are more highlighted. This is an inevitable consequence of the modern cities that the amount of the pollutants are higher than anywhere else in the world. Many coordinations take place by the municipals of the big cities to cope with this problem. The galloping rate by which the population is growing, may cause a disaster in the near future in terms of air pollution. As a result, strict limitations that governments compel the car manufacturers to produce low emission cars are being excessively exerted. In fact clean air is the least quality of requirments for welfare that people would subsist on. Similarily, waste disposal is another prominent subject which has been so remarkable these days. In early years, inaccurate means of trash disposal have awfully endangered the habitat of millions of people. Consequenly, scientists are developing innovative ways to safely dispose wastes, particularly radioactive and hospital wastes which directly put peoples’ health in danger.
Furthermore, as we see the autonomous actions by the independent people who consider their environments as a key factor in their spritual and material life, a promising idea triggers that people are not that careless. People help keeping environment clean with cleansing the landfills, because this is virtually the only possible way that ordinary people can collaborate. For instance, it’s a familiar news that a group of people have independently surfed a foul area which was full of microbial disposals. This actions are occasionally made to complain to the incompetence governments and reminde them to be more serious about this dangerous phenomenon.
To put in a nutshell, diligent people, governments, scientist are not too many but their contributions will definitely prevent this planet to devastate. This issue has been more topical since the global modernization and still will attract more attentions. I mostly look forward to the achievements of the reasearchers in this area, history have shown that they develop turning points in the action of coping with problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 327, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun act seems to be countable; consider using: 'many acts'.
Suggestion: many acts
...ve any attention to their surroundings, many act conscientiously and take care of it eff...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'familiar news'.
Suggestion: familiar news
...an collaborate. For instance, it's a familiar news that a group of people have independent...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 512, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
... which was full of microbial disposals. This actions are occasionally made to compla...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, may, so, still, for instance, in fact, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2160.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45454545455 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13402049789 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616161616162 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0748777696 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.684210526 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8421052632 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.89473684211 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125057968618 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0356193796708 0.076458572812 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367287343661 0.0737576698707 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0786587906928 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419724665901 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.