Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
If I had a choice to work tree days a week for long hours or to work for five days a week for shorter hours, I would definitely prefer the second option because of the reasons which will be discussed in details below.
Firstly, this proposal will allow a person to be in touch with family. The majority of contemporary parents complain that their jobs do not give them opportunity to devote their time to progeny. Working five days a week for shorter hours gives employees an indispensable opportunity to be constantly in touch with the family members. A mother who spends several hours at work still will have a plethora of time with the child day by day. By contrast, the idea to work three days for a longer hours, will not give a parent an opportunity to be close to the child all the time. In the worst scenario we may have a couple whose days of work will not match in this case they will not be able to spend time together and it may significantly deteriorate their relationships.
Secondly, five days week with short hours will be beneficial for person's health as well. An employee who works a moderate number of hours per day will not be exhausted from work; in fact, the psychological research which was conducted by Taxes University in 2014 has provided the evidence that persons who work shorter hours tend have better psychological state and they have fewer issues with physical health as well; moreover, they demonstrated higher efficiency of their work activity, for instance, they made less mistakes and did job quicker than the control group which worked for longer hours. The researchers concluded that the reason behind the results is people who work shorter hours do not undergo extreme tensions and have a needed rest.
Admittedly, there are some reasons which may allow someone to state that five days week is more beneficial. Chiefly, the one may aver that the person with this schedule will have several days in which he is absolutely free. Those days may be used for vocation, trips or education. However, I still affirm the alternative idea because there is no guarantee that those four days-off will be in row, in fact, they may be mixed up and in this case a person may not use those free days completely; furthermore, a worker with such a bad schedule may get no benefits and a lot of troubles. For instance, an employee who works longer hours will arrives at home late, thus he will end his chores late as well. Consequently, the one will probably have to sleep longer hours to invigorate him; therefore the day-off will be not used in completely.
To wrap up, five days week seems to be more attractive because it will let the worker to be in a good psychological and physical health as well as will let him devote a considerable and regular volume of time to family members.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
1. wrong:
Admittedly, there are some reasons which may allow someone to state that five days week is more beneficial.
should be:
Admittedly, there are some reasons which may allow someone to state that three days a week is more beneficial.
2. No. of Words: 498 while No. of Different Words: 225
potentially some duplicated content
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 25 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 498 350
No. of Characters: 2265 1500
No. of Different Words: 225 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.724 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.548 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.505 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 134 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 97 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 67 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 37 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.667 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 18.135 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.722 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.348 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.545 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.153 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 514, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun mistakes is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... work activity, for instance, they made less mistakes and did job quicker than the c...
^^^^
Line 7, column 638, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'arrive'
Suggestion: arrive
...an employee who works longer hours will arrives at home late, thus he will end his chor...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 9.8082437276 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2323.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 498.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66465863454 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58209586908 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461847389558 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 723.6 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => OK
Sentence length SD: 105.369870877 48.9658058833 215% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 136.647058824 100.406767564 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2941176471 20.6045352989 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.17647058824 5.45110844103 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307694011908 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131379068162 0.076458572812 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795932442045 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214835334892 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0937543821844 0.0645574589148 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 58.1214874552 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.34 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.