Today's world entirely different from 100 years before, there is technological improvement in each and every field such as communication, automobile, healthcare sector and education. This advancement gives better life who are living in urban as well the rural areas. Now we cannot live the life without these facilities, we became habituated to this lifestyle no matter where your from. But, when compare with internet and the transportation, people more look for internet facility rather than transportation. To support my argument I want to discuses some practical needs internet usage.
First of all, from the kids to old person using the browser for their education, entertainment, communication and sports. So, now it became our part life which is very amazing events past few decades. For example, kids learning the online course like UKG and LKG level onward. Further, even without going to the school they learn lot things around the world, therefor, they don't want any kind of vehicle drop them in their school which saves parent's time, so that they could reach the office without delay and mental tension. If, the government provide more fund for the internet, they can endeavor the children education. Government must consider this as important concern.
Moreover, people can have more fun from their home without going to the theater, concert and circus because internet brings everything to your home which doesn't need any kind transport facilities. By doing this we are not only saving the but also the natural resources like natural gas and so on. Further, driving car or van causes environmental issues like air pollution and noise which cause disturbance to the public. Better, we should use that valuable resource precise way, so that, future generation need not worry scare of these resources.
Finally, it gives great opportunity for people those want communicate with other without moving from their own places. Because of advancement in the internet which allows us keep in touch with our family from the long distance by chatting through video calls such as Skype, What's up that is wonderfulness of it. Here, you don't want any transport facility especially useful for those who are in bed and physical disable.
I want to conclude that even though little disadvantages with internet, it's advantage outweigh the transport usefulness, so, should provide more fund for the internet facilities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 567, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'needs'' or 'need's'?
Suggestion: needs'; need's
...ument I want to discuses some practical needs internet usage. First of all, fro...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 375, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...things around the world, therefor, they dont want any kind of vehicle drop them in t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 155, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...et brings everything to your home which doesnt need any kind transport facilities. By ...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 275, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...ting through video calls such as Skype, Whats up that is wonderfulness of it. Here, ...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ough video calls such as Skype, Whats up that is wonderfulness of it. Here, you d...
^^
Line 10, column 324, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... that is wonderfulness of it. Here, you dont want any transport facility especially ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more fund for the internet facilities.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, look, moreover, so, well, for example, kind of, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2047.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27577319588 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67774822994 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621134020619 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6506353994 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.736842105 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4210526316 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26315789474 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149711322712 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458798234307 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059721441434 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0896885485903 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389901624373 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.