Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Twenty years from now, students will no longer use printed books.
Books reading has been an appealing topic in our modern society. Readers nowadays widely argue that in two decades, e-books will completely replace printed books in students’ choices. Personally, I disapprove of this argument.
In the first place, what I put in my priority is effective knowledge acquisition. It cannot be denied that in any printed books, information is bound to be chosen carefully. This is because in limited pages of a printed book, authors are merely able to transform limited knowledge. This leads them to select the most essential information to include in their books. As a result, after various times of consideration, well informed printed books are published. They are undoubtedly good and believable sources of knowledge to any learners. More importantly, every published book purely concentrates in one big topic. For example, a biology text book might contain only information about structure of bodies, environmental factors, etc, while a history book may only about events happening in past time. This creates chances for readers, once lingering in printed books, to study deeply about one topic. With no doubt, printed books are the most reliable source of information for everyone.
In the second place, personally enjoyment holds no less importance. The fact is that learning through printed books may avoid unwanted distraction. Indeed, when approaching knowledge by e-books or the Internet, one may be attracted by a lot of factors. To illustrate, when I read books on the Internet, I usually simultaneously turn on a tab for social network. This always stops me from being focus on my reading as messages are sometimes sent to my account. As a result, my trend of thought is ruined, and effectiveness of reading is therefore decreased. To avoid all of these disturbances, the best way is to read a printed book! More amazingly, collecting favorable books is the hobby of a lot of readers. For instance, my dad fancies in reading foreign novels. As a result, he buys numerous books around the world to read. It adds up to hundreds of books and he puts all of them in a big bookshelf. He is very proud of his book collection and introduces it to everyone coming to our home. Indeed, printed books can be a source of convenience and happiness.
On the other hand, some people may insist that e-books nowadays are far cheaper than printed books. As a consequence, choosing to read printed books will destroy readers’ pocket. However, this is not necessarily the case as a printed book is usually quite long (hundreds of pages), which ensures that to printed will be long-used. Furthermore, purchasing printed books is certainly a wise investment for future. Indeed, printed books bring the most precise and selective information. Accordingly, reading a printed books for one hour, one may acquire more valuable knowledge than reading an ebook for an entire day. Consequently, students, reading printed books, are likely to have rich knowledge and possibly thrive in their future. By and large, the opinion that printed books are a waste of money may end in collapse.
In conclusion, these mentioned above are convincing reasons for my disapproval. It is strongly recommended that students worldwide should take my writing into careful consideration to come up with appropriate decisions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 792, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...book may only about events happening in past time. This creates chances for readers, once...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 519, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'book'?
Suggestion: book
...rmation. Accordingly, reading a printed books for one hour, one may acquire more valu...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, consequently, first, furthermore, however, may, second, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result, by and large, in the first place, in the second place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2803.0 1977.66487455 142% => OK
No of words: 542.0 407.700716846 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17158671587 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82502781895 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95620610909 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 287.0 212.727598566 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529520295203 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 869.4 618.680645161 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 35.0 20.6003584229 170% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4346179641 48.9658058833 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.0857142857 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4857142857 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68571428571 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108013367066 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0335658009525 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333729192674 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0697683607837 0.150856017488 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265133528494 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 86.8835125448 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.