do you agree or disagree? students should consider studying in fields related to subjects like technology, math, science and so, if even they are more interested in other subjects.

Essay topics:

do you agree or disagree? students should consider studying in fields related to subjects like technology, math, science and so, if even they are more interested in other subjects.

The question is whether students should consider studying in fields related to subjects like technology, math, science and so, if even they are more interested in other subjects or not. Everyone with regard to cons and pros of this issue can maintain a specific direction toward this statement; however I am willing to refute it. In my perspective, the passion and interest in a subject is the most important factor in the prosperity. My arguments and reasons are listed below which will strengthen my point of view:

To begin with, it is axiomatic that the modern world keeps marching forward; however nothing replaces with human's feeling. When someone is inclined to study in his favorite field seriously, no matter how special, definitely he can be successful and also advantageous for his society. There are a fair of amount artistic achievement in every country which have supported this reality; consequently it is far away from justice that a country's success will be summarized in technology, science or math fields.

The second reason why I refute this idea lies in the fact of health. One should not forget that money is not whole of life, but is a part of it. Nowadays it may be ridiculous; however nobody could overlook the spiritual aspects of life. People can set their children under pressure to study in engineering fields; however is it a logical approach for being successful their children in the future? I remember when my friend was forced to study in medical field due to her father's request, while she had a great passion toward the painting. Unfortunately she did not continue her filed and she suffers from depression disease; subsequently her future destroyed.

Moreover, there is a bit of different here. It is a personal experience from my own life. I had already studied software engineering; whereas the archaeology field was my dream. Since I was aware from lack of job opportunities for this field in my country; hence I selected engineering. It really was tough field and my soul hurt. After graduated, my mother motivated me to change my field. With her aids, I could make an appropriate decision and go toward archaeology field, now I am a prosperous archaeologist with a perfect background in this major.

As I have illustrated, I strongly disagree with this suggestion. The students should consider to their interests. The money may solve the economic problems; but it has never been a noticeable solution. The valid success will be obtained through passion.

Votes
Average: 9 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'fairs'?
Suggestion: fairs
...vantageous for his society. There are a fair of amount artistic achievement in every...
^^^^
Line 9, column 203, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t has never been a noticeable solution. The valid success will be obtained through ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, really, second, so, then, whereas, while, as for, as to, to begin with, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2093.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01918465228 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84944362942 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589928057554 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9225447448 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1304347826 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.60869565217 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211057532568 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611015382442 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138214775511 0.0737576698707 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120628719196 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111968389033 0.0645574589148 173% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.