Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect in your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader.
-say nothing
Undoubtedly, being involved in places in which people have close working relationships, taking care of the behavior is of great importance. Misbehavior during a serious working situation will end up in an awful decline in position or totally expelling from the job. Therefore, In my notion, being patient will be the most reasonable action among the options presented.
To begin with, one of the most important feature of a meeting is its quietness and organization. This is very usual that some of the meeting members make mistakes during their speech or presentations. In this case, the reciprocal reaction would be greatly decisive. Postponing the critic’s reply to the end of the session will be a wise choice, because of that interruption and correcting the mistake immediately may cause a debate in the meeting which is completely against the standard rules of a meeting. This may bother the other audience and bring inconsistency to the lecture as well. Tranquility makes big differences in critical circumstances specially the ones related to formal meetings.
Furthermore, people usually are not able to provide convincing answers in a short time. In fact, this is common that meeting leaders look for very tiny points to bring them up as the wrong aspects. Thereby, to make a good answer to their idea, one should profoundly think in advance. In this case the reply would be comprehensive in order to satisfy the meeting leader efficiently. Conversely, an inadequate response would have an adverse effect on the whole reputation of the lecturer, Therefore an exhaustive response takes time, and it’s not possible to make it in a few seconds during lecture.
Finally, if it is possible to advocate of your opinion and ideas against what the fault-finder asks, it still wouldn’t be a rational option. It’s been observed many times in the conferences that when people begin to talk and debate about a mere point of mistake during the lecture, it takes such a time that many main ideas of the presentation would be overlooked. Ultimately it will be negative point from the lecturer and with a nice management of time, this will not occur.
To put in a nutshell, accepting the opposing ideas from other people is a valuable feature that is gainable only with practice. It greatly impacts the others attitude toward us, as a result everyone acts according to the most plausible one which is staying calm.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...d organization. This is very usual that some of the meeting members make mistakes during th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 152, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...y with practice. It greatly impacts the others attitude toward us, as a result everyon...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, furthermore, if, look, may, second, so, still, therefore, well, in fact, as a result, on the whole, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2042.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09226932668 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90845347608 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5536159601 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7204929966 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.473684211 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1052631579 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05263157895 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100149127624 0.236089414692 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0316725358783 0.076458572812 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440495998503 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0517746642737 0.150856017488 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436429513481 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.