Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? •Interrupt and correct the mistake right away. •Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader. •Say nothing. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It's common that people often have different opinions when it comes to some issue. When people believe others' idea is wrong, they may choose different attitude towards it. Some people might immediately correct what they think is wrong, while others could reserve their ideas rather than express it directly. If I face the situation referred in the question, I must choose to wait until the class or meeting is over and then express my idea to the teacher or leader because expressing what we think is right is necessary no matter in study or work but it's also important to consider the feeling of teacher or leader.
First, everyone has the right to express his/her opinion. In other words, expressing individual opinion is a brave behavior. If we don't correct the wrong idea, teacher and students might not be aware that there is something incorrect in the classroom. If we say nothing and just leave the question alone, this question can be never solved. If we raise our doubt to teacher, teacher will judge whether we are right or wrong. Once we are right, teacher will correct the problem in next class and all the classmates will be benefited. Even we are wrong, at least we get the chance to dispel our own doubts.
Second, it's not appropriate to interrupt the class in order to present our idea. As we can see, we need to respect other people. That is to say, as students, we also should respect our teachers. So when they are teaching in the class whereas we interrupt them to point out their wrong without considering the their feelings will lead them to feel embarrassed. It's easy for us to accept the idea that if we want to receive respect from other people, we should at first respect other people. Relationship between teacher and students isn't an exception of this principle. Thereby, if we wait until the class is over and talk to teacher, teacher will be happy to accept our suggestion because we do this in a relative private situation instead of a public situation. Then teacher might feel grateful for us consideration thus our relationship will be improved.
From all the above we have discussed, I still strongly believe in my choice that we should wait until the class is over and people are gone, then talk the problem to the teacher. Because saying nothing is not responsible for ourselves as well as teachers and other students while correcting teacher right away considerate and also make teacher embarrassed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...dual opinion is a brave behavior. If we dont correct the wrong idea, teacher and stu...
^^^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...one, this question can be never solved. If we raise our doubt to teacher, teacher ...
^^
Line 5, column 306, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...int out their wrong without considering the their feelings will lead them to feel embarra...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 533, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...lationship between teacher and students isnt an exception of this principle. Thereby...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, still, then, thus, well, whereas, while, at least, as well as, in other words, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2022.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78014184397 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.494881839 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482269503546 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 610.2 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.975618629 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2857142857 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18193083316 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060767993512 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540253438147 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127569188172 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300845319915 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.