Since the dawn of civilisation, people live together and need each other in every society. These feelings that being in need made them close. Neighborhoods was significant in every era. A controversial question that is raised recently regarding people is what make individuals a good neighborhood. Some people adhere to the idea and claim that it is not important for people. Some others, take a radically different standpoint and believe that as long as people live, neighborhood will maintain it’s meaning. I am the former and I think some features become persons more special as a neighborhood.
First of all, the foremost reason is coming to my mind is being friendly. In our daily life, we have good or bad events. If I want to move new place I look for a neighborhood which is friendly. I want to share my problem with him or her. To clarify, take may own experience, I live in Istanbul and I have wonderfull neigborhoods. We meet at my home every week and I call my secret which I struggle. Becase of his friendship my life is eaiser.
In addition the importance of being friendly, it is remarkable to consider that resonsibility is another factor that make a person good neighborhood. People have different circumstance in daily routine. Sometime we need a person who is trustable. Sometimes, life is more harder that we can not carry. At this point neighboors can help in numerours way. By the way of example, my mother used to work when I was a child in Istanbul. I used stayed at Our neighborhood during her workhour because my mother trusted her.
Lastly but not least, being helpful is another striking point. Families are essential part of every society. Many people are struggling with make decent living. Many of them earn less money then ever nowadays. They need to help eachothers which have economic problem. To make it clear, i will tell my experience. Before 2 years ago i quited my job due to economic reccesion. I struggled to pay my house rent. Our neighborhood who lived in 2 floor helped me. This is made him more important
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 538, Rule ID: YOU_THING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'think' or 'thinks'?
Suggestion: think; thinks
...t's meaning. I am the former and I thing some features become persons more speci...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...his friendship my life is eaiser. In addition the importance of being friendly, it is...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'harder' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: harder
...on who is trustable. Sometimes, life is more harder that we can not carry. At this point ne...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 191, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...nt living. Many of them earn less money then ever nowadays. They need to help eachot...
^^^^
Line 7, column 287, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ave economic problem. To make it clear, i will tell my experience. Before 2 years...
^
Line 7, column 314, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Before” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ke it clear, i will tell my experience. Before 2 years ago i quited my job due to econ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, lastly, look, may, regarding, so, then, in addition, by the way, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 358.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77094972067 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87362159487 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558659217877 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.6003584229 150% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 20.1344086022 55% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7493613467 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 55.0967741935 100.406767564 55% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.5483870968 20.6045352989 56% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.45110844103 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0843223713977 0.236089414692 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0217235295932 0.076458572812 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.029656841021 0.0737576698707 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0542474939303 0.150856017488 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273207488848 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.8 11.7677419355 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.77 58.1214874552 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.2 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.0537634409 64% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.