In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
Nowadays, it is crucial to become aware of everything in the world, and people have many ways to collect and comprehend information from diverse places. Personally, I think that to get information from various resources can make a person well-informed. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the subsequent paragraphs.
First of all, with many different sources, people can understand information sufficiently and efficiently. If we consider that in this century, the explosion of the Internet with high speed permits people to do their research properly, they can find information more conveniently. Furthermore, they can do an investigation with the help of books in a traditional way. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. Approximately three years ago, I had been preparing my assignment for my final project at school. In reality, I was noticing my presentation's importance because it was my last way to compensate for unfulfilled exams, so I started to look at many sources on the Internet with the help of a cellphone. Although I suffered very much, research helped me enrich my knowledge and understanding of my work. Fortunately, in the end, I got great grades, which was a perfect situation. If I had not used diverse resources, I could not have done my project correctly. This example demonstrates how learning information from various places might be useful to do our missions normally.
Secondly, using many sources to get information will help us in guaranteeing our information. Because sometimes, we can only have a look at a single book and do work right away, which can cause severe problems. On the other hand, making many investigations can make our project perfect and reliable. For instance, when my cousin should have submitted his assignment about exams, he examined very much information about them. Indeed, he sought a lot to find reliable sources and successfully reached his aim. Even I preferred him to use one tool called "Terrinoca" to get valid information. From my cousin's experience, you can see that doing more research can be useful to get guaranteed reports.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that it is better to learn something from many places in order to be well-informed. This is because people can understand information properly and because they can guarantee their projects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays, it is crucial to become aware ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...explore in the subsequent paragraphs. First of all, with many different source...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 27, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...paragraphs. First of all, with many different sources, people can understand informat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 354, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a traditional way" with adverb for "traditional"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...an investigation with the help of books in a traditional way. My personal experience is a compelling...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e useful to do our missions normally. Secondly, using many sources to get info...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n be useful to get guaranteed reports. In conclusion, I firmly believe that it ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, look, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, i feel, i think, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1990.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16883116883 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23076165639 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0832143749 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4545454545 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13636363636 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247511024942 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771830836628 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0929442104071 0.0737576698707 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184999890768 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646025747246 0.0645574589148 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.