Some scientists believe that students under the age of 12 should have different teachers every day like the students who are between 12-18 years old. Do you agree or disagree?
The question is whether students in 12 years age should have different types of teachers or not. Everyone with regard to his private view point can maintain a specific direction toward this statement; however, I am inclined to affirm that instructing by several teachers can provide advantageous aspects in students' personality and education and all of these merits are able to guarantee the young's future. I feel this way for some reasons, which I will explore them in following essay to empower my vantage point:
To begin with, nobody could overlook this fact that the most of children have trouble in adapting to school's condition particularly in first years of study. Based on a done research by a well-known institution in my country, rather 75 percentages of children in this age are reluctant in going to the classrooms. Playing with friends at home without any burden of assignment is one of the biggest children's desires; hence, for solving such a fatigue circumstance, the schools and its staff can offer a system which assist students to avoid any lethargy or numb feeling. In short, visiting different types of teachers with diverse approaches of teaching can be a stone stepping for the 12 years young to refresh their mind in a variety of courses.
The second reason for my argument lies the fact that every tutor employs a wide range of instructions of education. Some teachers may apply active methods in class such as bring a live frog into a biology class to keep students' attention and others may instruct with passive strategies. The different types of methods would play a crucial role in learning of the young; consequently, they will not be restricted in learning scientific or art matters. Meanwhile, one should not forget that since in such a great plan, students have to adapt to different pressures and positions, therefore, they have an opportunity to challenge their abilities. Needless to say that experiencing new points can help students' brain to secrete more Dopamine- a chemical substance which is responsible for creating happiness and concentration.
To sum up, this conclusion could be drawn spending time with exclusive teachers in every course increases students ' eager for attending in the school and adjusting with school's life will not be hard any more, even more the young children will improve their performance to prepare for high-level of education in high -school.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the children') or simply say ''most children''.
Suggestion: most of the children; most children
...obody could overlook this fact that the most of children have trouble in adapting to schools con...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'school'.
Suggestion: school
...of children have trouble in adapting to schools condition particularly in first years o...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...chers in every course increases students eager for attending in the school and ad...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, however, if, look, may, second, so, therefore, well, while, i feel, in short, of course, such as, to begin with, to sum up, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2028.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10831234257 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80480144637 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584382871537 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.1344086022 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.726200639 48.9658058833 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.0 100.406767564 168% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0833333333 20.6045352989 161% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8333333333 5.45110844103 254% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189073743734 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833343073907 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0954123418469 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119370926166 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500232318086 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 11.7677419355 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.0537634409 151% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.