Sometimes we are assigned to work in a group on a project. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The group will be helped more by person who will be willing to do what other group members want than by person who often strongly insists that things should be done in a way that is different from what the group wants to do.
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the fact that respectful communication has played a paramount role in each group. Leaders in various groups seek for new ideas and procedure for the stepping-stone to achieving group’s goals. Not all people can concur when this issue arises. To being cognizant to the logic behind those who endorse or repudiate the legitimacy of this contention, not having any biased perception, I presume that members who follow the accepted instructions and ideas of the whole group are more productive than a person which just considers his/her own contributions without consideration group’s preferences. Among a plentitude of reasons in support of this assertion, importance of being consistent with other and stimulating members for working efficiently could be picked out for further analysis.
To commence with, a consensus has yet to be reached; however, regarding synergy in effective collaborations based upon the statistics of different general questionnaires in sundry countries, people are unanimous about the conviction that members should propose their ideas in group’s meeting and investigate each one. This procedure helps to find the best proposal which all people participate in its selection. In addition, when members work in a unique and the same attitude, the pace of the group for acquiring its aim increases substantially. A vivid example can be given to shed light on what was elaborated above. Last year me and my friends work on the program for increase the performance of some devices in our faculty in Sharif University of technology. Before the start, all members gave their solutions and we found the proper solution after a long discussion and voting. This manner increases collaboration among my friend because all of us worked for common goals and we finished it before its due time based on the friendship and discipline of the group.
In addition to the reason raised above; urging members by using their ideas in the different situation in a group could also substantiate the justifiability of the claim made at the outset of this essay. In conjunction with public belief, leaders by applying member’s ideas increase member’s efforts and encourage them to work better. To delineate, it makes them the sense of usefulness and lively. Thus, they would try more for doing their duties which it causes increasing the performance of the whole group. For instance, in the aforementioned example in the above, my friends attempt to work harder based on their ideas in consistency with the whole goal of the group. Moreover, they were happier and urge to show their productivity which makes our project as the best project in optimization in the universities. Thus, it would be a highlight point in our resumes.
Drawing upon, discreetly put, as far as my personal perspective on the topic is concerned, I reiterate that group’s member should attempt in the single and most accepted attribute for the success of the group instead of working alone and in contrast with the consistency of the group. It increases not only discipline but also people’s urge in the group.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 720, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'showing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'urge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: showing
...p. Moreover, they were happier and urge to show their productivity which makes our proj...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, for instance, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 52.1666666667 161% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2649.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 510.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19411764706 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75217629947 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02992951981 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 822.6 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.119126052 48.9658058833 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.142857143 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263452686439 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755485113916 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547874411855 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176801730452 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422291830135 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 86.8835125448 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.