Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

The teacher has a fundamental role in the educational status of the society. The significance of this role is appreciated in the various ways. While some people may hold the view that the teachers had the respectful stand among the population in the past; others, on the other hand, believe they are more valued nowadays rather than the past. I personally agree with the first belief. Among the countless reasons which give adherence to my perspective, I will delve into the most conspicuous ones in what follows.

To begin with, there is a wide range of expertise nowadays in comparison with the past. The complicated expertise of the people is challenging the former sole teacher with the holistic knowledge. In the past, one instructor assumed as the entire source of information and knowledge; someone whose knowledge was as equal as the talented scientist and the rare people could compete with him on the scientific issues. However, today, people are well-educated, and everyone possesses a particular area of skill. Therefore, each individual has this knowledge to understand everything, and the teachers' knowledge is not a far-fetched subject. Even the people's knowledge is beyond the teachers' education. As a result, in this situation, the teacher does not appreciate as the knowledgeable person, who own in-depth information related to whole issues.

The second equally striking point which advocates my outlook is that there is an alteration of the educational principle. In fact, in the past, the teacher was the center of the training process; the teacher defined the educational method and its policy. On the other hand, based on the today's business rules the students as a client indicate the control of the school. Actually, the primary aim of the modern economic is appealing the customers to make the best profit. Thereby the students' satisfaction as the client of the schools is crucial. According to the noteworthy, intelligence survey conducted in my country, approximately sixty-five percent of the schools in Iran give priority to the students and their wills, in a case which the students are not happy with the teacher's function, they can question the teacher. This study evidently demonstrates that the teachers' authority and role become pale.

Finally, the third reason which gives adherence to my idea is that there is a complete change in the society and people interaction. While in the past, the individual had the well-defined stand in the society and if his position was beneficial for the community, he respected as a holy person; nowadays, there is a big gap from this attitude. In the modern society, for the sake of the high density of the population, the individual is not as important as the past. It does not matter how useful a person is in a community; there is a list of persons who can be as effective as him. Consequently, that helpful person does not have a specific status among the people. The teachers and their role are not exceptional from this fact too. A vivid example can be given to shed light on the issue is my professor's instance. My professor is one of the well-known professors in my field, and he has been taught the physic for thirty-five years. Unfortunately, he has got the heart attack and now he does not teach at my university. Just after his retirement, the university locates another knowledgeable professor in this field instead of my professor. This example presents the values of the teacher's function is not as important as it was in the past.

To wrap it up, all aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that the teachers are not as respectful as they were in the past. The broad expertise, and alteration of the educational system, and the change of the society links pave the path to this variation.

Votes

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Comments

Essay evaluation report by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...most conspicuous ones in what follows. To begin with, there is a wide range of ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 589, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...ledge to understand everything, and the teachers knowledge is not a far-fetched subject....
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 647, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... is not a far-fetched subject. Even the peoples knowledge is beyond the teachers educat...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 679, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...ven the peoples knowledge is beyond the teachers education. As a result, in this situati...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 484, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...rs to make the best profit. Thereby the students satisfaction as the client of the schoo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 869, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...s study evidently demonstrates that the teachers authority and role become pale. Fin...
^^^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'consequently', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'third', 'well', 'while', 'in fact', 'as a result', 'to begin with', 'on the other hand']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.246458923513 0.229887763892 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.124645892351 0.158761421928 79% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0835694050992 0.0866891130778 96% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0467422096317 0.046263068375 101% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0410764872521 0.0685040099705 60% => OK
Prepositions: 0.120396600567 0.118717715034 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0155807365439 0.0351676179071 44% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.90819712455 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0169971671388 0.0309702414327 55% => OK
Particles: 0.0014164305949 0.00188951952338 75% => OK
Determiners: 0.165722379603 0.0887237588012 187% => Less determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00849858356941 0.0209618222197 41% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0127478753541 0.0139019557991 92% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3798.0 2387.08602151 159% => OK
No of words: 635.0 408.028673835 156% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.9811023622 5.86048508987 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.01988110783 4.48200974243 112% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.346456692913 0.338922669872 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.285039370079 0.251872472559 113% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.212598425197 0.174417080927 122% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.149606299213 0.112833075102 133% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90819712455 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 299.0 212.727598566 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470866141732 0.524397521467 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 58.4652595733 59.2087087015 99% => OK
How many sentences: 32.0 20.6684587814 155% => OK
Sentence length: 19.84375 20.5533526081 97% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3314285598 48.84282405 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.6875 120.699889404 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.84375 20.5533526081 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5625 0.644075263715 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.54480286738 108% => OK
Readability: 48.3476870079 45.7405998639 106% => OK
Elegance: 1.8 1.45489161554 124% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299257841983 0.300154397459 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.134385432486 0.103427244359 130% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0888367507229 0.0752933317313 118% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.577536854298 0.497263757937 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.175910912622 0.151897553556 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126902607629 0.114077575197 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621640178862 0.0781384742642 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.632763110545 0.336927656856 188% => Paragraphs have same ideas.
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0507154622398 0.067059652881 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246870519545 0.210909579961 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385769112516 0.0618886996521 62% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8870967742 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.91756272401 285% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 12.0 8.42114695341 142% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 12.0 2.75985663082 435% => Less neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 27.0 13.6433691756 198% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Essay evaluation report by e-grader

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments